MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2112243235 · doi:10.1176/pn.39.6.0061

Brain Activation May Explain PTSD Flashbacks

2004· article· en· W2112243235 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joan Arehart-Treichel

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologySexual abusePosttraumatic stressPsychiatryRecallClinical psychologyMedicineInjury preventionPoison controlCognitive psychologyMedical emergency

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Clinical & Research NewsFull AccessBrain Activation May Explain PTSD FlashbacksJoan Arehart-TreichelJoan Arehart-TreichelSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:19 Mar 2004https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.39.6.0061When persons with posttraumatic stress disorder remember trauma, right areas of their brains tend to be activated, whereas when individuals without PTSD remember trauma, left areas of their brains are apt to be aroused, according to a study reported in the January American Journal of Psychiatry.The study was headed by Ruth Lanius, M.D., Ph.D., an assistant professor of psychiatry at the University of Western Ontario in London, Ontario, and an affiliate of the Robarts Research Institute.Lanius and her colleagues studied 11 persons who had developed PTSD as a result of sexual abuse/assault or of a motor vehicle accident, and 13 persons who had experienced sexual abuse/assault or a motor vehicle accident but did not develop PTSD as a result. All subjects were right-handed and of similar age, gender, and race.Each of these subjects was instructed to recall the traumatic event that he or she had experienced. While the subjects were recollecting, the scientists determined which areas of their brains were activated using functional magnetic resonance imaging and functional connectivity analyses. These permit assessment of the activity of a network of neurons across more than one area of the brain.The investigators found notable differences between the two groups when they compared the results. For example, subjects with PTSD showed more activation in certain right-brain areas—the right posterior cingulate gyrus, the right caudate, the right parietal lobe, and the right occipital lobe. Subjects without PTSD showed more activation in certain left-brain areas—the left superior frontal gyrus, the left anterior cingulated gyrus, the left caudate, the left parietal lobe, and the left insula.Lanius and her team suspect that this contrasting pattern of brain activation may help explain why PTSD patients tend to experience traumatic recall as flashbacks (spontaneous, vivid, usually visual memories unchanging over time) and why non-PTSD individuals are more apt to experience traumatic memories as verbal narratives.For example, the right parietal lobe is known to be involved in the nonverbal memory retrieval of events in people’s lives, so its activation while persons with PTSD are remembering distressing events may very well help explain why they recall these events as flashbacks. In contrast, the left brain areas activated by non-PTSD individuals when they recollect disturbing events are consistent with verbal episodic memory retrieval and may help explain why they remember such events as verbal narratives.“This is a fantastically interesting study,” Bessel van der Kolk, M.D., a professor of psychiatry at Boston University and medical director of the Trauma Center there, said in an interview. “Dr. Lanius has elegantly demonstrated how people’s brain function differs when they are in dissociate states. . . . We always suspected that when people go into these states, there is a decrease in activation of the left inferior prefrontal cortex—meaning that people are less capable of taking in new information and being curious about the world out there—and that the brain shifts to a more right posterior activation—more to a state of fear and flight.”Dutch scientists have also just published findings very similar to those of Lanius and her colleagues, van der Kolk pointed out, which gives added legitimacy to the findings of Lanius and her team.Van der Kolk said that he was pleased to see such studies being pursued by Canadian and European scientists.The study was financed by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Ontario Mental Health Foundation.The study, “The Nature of Traumatic Memories: A 4-T fMRI Functional Connectivity Analysis,” is posted online at http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/161/1/36?. ▪ Am J Psychiatry 2004 161 36 ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,227
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,052
Tête enseignante GPT0,355
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatric NewsMême sujetTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchTravaux en français237 207