MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2112455505 · doi:10.5339/qfarf.2013.biop-034

The Advice Infrastructure For Generating And Delivering Evidence-Informed Clinical Decision Support Services: A Knowledge Management Approach

2013· article· en· W2112455505 sur OpenAlexaff
Syed Sibte Raza Abidi

Notice bibliographique

RevueQatar Foundation Annual Research Forum Volume 2013 Issue 1 · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésClinical decision support systemDecision support systemKnowledge managementHealth careAnalyticsOperationalizationDecision aidsComputer scienceProcess managementMedicineBusinessData scienceArtificial intelligence

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Next generation computerized healthcare services are destined to be knowledge-centric—i.e. leveraging best-evidence and best clinical practices to provide evidence-informed, patient-centered, safe, timely, and cost-effective care services. In this paper, we present an health informatics based clinical decision support infrastructure—termed as ADVICE (Agile Decisional Validation and Individualized Care Environment)—that offers evidence-informed decision support services for both physicians and patients. The ADVICE infrastructure (Fig 1) purports an integrated healthcare environment that syngerizes both healthcare knowledge and healthcare data to derive decision support services. The key functional aspects of ADVICE are: (a) transformation and translation of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) to evidence-informed decision-support for physicians; (b) engagement and empowerment of patients in their care process; and (c) health data analytics to derive health operational intelligence. We take a knowledge management approach to develop the key modules of the ADVICE infrastructure, which are as follows: (A) Physician Oriented Clinical Decision Support: This module offers the functionality to develop CPG based Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) that can be deployed within an health institution to provide evidence-informed patient care at the point-of-care. We have developed a semantic web based CPG operationalization framework that comprises three main modules: (a) CPG computerization, whereby we use our CPG ontology (Fig 2) to semantically model and computerize disease-specific CPG; (b) CPG institutionalization, whereby a generic computerized CPG is institutionalized with respect to an institution's constraints, such as policies, resources, quality indicators. This is achieved by employing workflow modeling methods to transform the computerized CPG to an institution-specific clinical workflow; and (c) CPG operationalization, whereby a computerized clinical workflow is executed using patient data to deliver evidence-informed care recommendations to physicians. We have developed specialized CPG execution engines that operationalize a computerized CPG to provide recommendations for both single disease and comorbid diseases. The CDSS can be integrated with EMR and delivered through web-based interfaces and mobile devices. (B) Patient-Oriented Care Services: ADVICE offers a continuum of personalized, proactive and persistent home-based care services designed to assist patients throughout their care journey. The key patient-oriented care services offered are: (i) Personalized CarePlan that depicts the longitudinal discourse of the patient's care journey (fig 3); (ii) Personalized Self-management Programs to educate patients to self-manage their conditions. Educational and motivations interventions are tailored based on the patient's health and behavior profiles, and are delivered to patients through mobile devices (smart phones); (iii) Patient Surveillance to monitor the health state of a patient and then provide rapid response in need of care. This is achieved by continuously processing patient data from a range of home-based health monitoring devices and then generating alerts based on patient-specific alert rules. ADVICE infrastructure offers an innovative suite of technology-enabled healthcare services delivered through mobile devices and secure websites. ADVICE offers a new approach to the determination of care interventions—i.e. integrating clinical factors with patient-specific health, psychosocial and behavioral aspects to contextualize the care interventions. We will present demonstrator CDSS (fig 4) and patient self-management applications for cancer care, comorbid congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,792
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,619

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,420
Écart entre enseignants0,371 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueQatar Foundation Annual Research Forum Volume 2013 Issue 1Même sujetBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesTravaux en français237 207