Do Glaciers Listen? Local Knowledge, Colonial Encounters, and Social Imagination/Our Box Was Full: An Ethnography for the Delgamuukw Plaintiffs/A Breach of Duty: Fiduciary Obligations and Aboriginal Peoples/Advancing Aboriginal Claims: Visions/Strategies/Directions/Between Justice and Certainty: Treaty Making in British Columbia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Julie Cruikshank, Do Glaciers Listen? Local Knowledge, Colonial Encounters, and Social Imagination (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2005), xii + 328 pp. Cloth. $85. ISBN 0-7748- 1186-2. Richard Daly, Our Box Was Full: An Ethnography for the Delgamuukw Plaintiffs (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2005), xix + 384 pp. Cloth. $85. ISBN 0-7748-1074-2. Paper. $29.95. ISBN 0-7748-1075. James I. Reynolds, A Breach of Duty: Fiduciary Obligations and Aboriginal Peoples (Saskatoon: Purich Publishing Ltd, 2005), xxv + 336 pp. Paper. £38. ISBN 1-8958- 3025-7. Kerry Wilkins (ed.), Advancing Aboriginal Claims: Visions/Strategies/Directions (Saskatoon: Purich Publishing Ltd, 2004), 320 pp. Paper. $38. ISBN 1-8958-3024-9. Andrew Woolford, Between Justice and Certainty: Treaty Making in British Columbia (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2005), ix + 248 pp. Cloth. $85. ISBN 0-7748-1131-5. It is about ten years since completion of the report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. In the intervening years, litigation, the treaty process and other negotiations have continued slowly. The background to these proceedings includes scholarship by anthropologists, sociologists, lawyers, and others, independently and on behalf of Aboriginal peoples. These five books are contemporary markers of understanding of Aboriginal knowledge and traditions and indicators of the legal context of negotiations. They reveal the contributions of social research to legal and political decision-making, provide accounts of discussions of strategies for promoting Aboriginal rights and raise questions about ways forward for Aboriginal communities. Do Glaciers Listen? considers Aboriginal views of agency and change in the environment, bringing together themes from social anthropology, history and environmental studies in its analysis of local knowledge, colonial encounters and environmental change. The period of human encounter analysed by Julie Cruikshank coincides with the later phases of the 'Little Ice Age' (1550-1850). The territory it covers is the Yukon and Alaska. Cruikshank is critical of instrumental usage of 'Traditional Ecological Knowledge', raises questions about how people relate to the natural world, and makes cautionary comments about policies for environmental protection. As Cruikshank makes clear, colonial exploration and settlement in northwestern North America occurred at the same time as the environment was changing. There were contrasts between European conceptions of division between nature and culture and those of indigenous peoples, whose 'oral traditions frame glaciers as intensely social spaces where human behaviour, especially casual hubris or arrogance, can trigger dramatic and unpleasant consequences in the physical world' (p. 11; emphasis in original). She argues that the contrasting views of the environment in oral history of local people and the historical records of the colonisers have consequences for current debates about the environment, climate change, and indigenous peoples' rights. Life histories from elderly Aboriginal women who lived in southern Yukon Territory treat glaciers as active and dynamic. These accounts are compared to those by European scientists and travellers, with illustrations from maps, photographs, and drawings. The consequences of different views of the environment and associated policies are made clear. Cruikshank remarks, for example, that recent designation of areas occupied by Aboriginal people as national parks has 'disenfranchised indigenous hunters at the stroke of a pen' (p. 253). Land rights and boundary issues are at the heart of Daly's ethnographic account of the lives of the Gitksan and Witsuwit'en peoples of northwest British Columbia. Whereas Cruikshank's study is about relations between indigenous peoples and Europeans, Daly's project raises questions about relations between indigenous peoples, particularly with regard to differing Nisga'a and Gitksan- Witsuwit'en concepts of landholding and contested territory. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,028 | 0,019 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».