MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2114026223 · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2007.05.016

KANTBP: A program for computing energy levels, reaction matrix and radial wave functions in the coupled-channel hyperspherical adiabatic approach

2007· article· en· W2114026223 sur OpenAlexaff
О. Чулуунбаатар, А. А. Гусев, A.G. Abrashkevich, A. Amaya-Tapia, Michael S. Kaschiev, S. Y. Larsen, S. I. Vinitsky

Notice bibliographique

RevueComputer Physics Communications · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Établissements canadiensIBM (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFortranPentiumComputer scienceTest dataUnixMatrix (chemical analysis)Computational scienceParallel computingSoftwareProgramming language

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A FORTRAN 77 program is presented which calculates energy values , reaction matrix and corresponding radial wave functions in a coupled-channel approximation of the hyperspherical adiabatic approach. In this approach, a multi-dimensional Schrödinger equation is reduced to a system of the coupled second-order ordinary differential equations on the finite interval with homogeneous boundary conditions of the third type. The resulting system of radial equations which contains the potential matrix elements and first-derivative coupling terms is solved using high-order accuracy approximations of the finite-element method. As a test desk, the program is applied to the calculation of the energy values and reaction matrix for an exactly solvable 2D-model of three identical particles on a line with pair zero-range potentials. Program summary Program title: KANTBP Catalogue identifier: ADZH_v1_0 Program summary URL: http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/summaries/ADZH_v1_0.html Program obtainable from: CPC Program Library, Queen's University, Belfast, N. Ireland Licensing provisions: Standard CPC licence, http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/licence/licence.html No. of lines in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 4224 No. of bytes in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 31 232 Distribution format: tar.gz Programming language: FORTRAN 77 Computer: Intel Xeon EM64T, Alpha 21264A, AMD Athlon MP, Pentium IV Xeon, Opteron 248, Intel Pentium IV Operating system: OC Linux, Unix AIX 5.3, SunOS 5.8, Solaris, Windows XP RAM : depends on (a) the number of differential equations; (b) the number and order of finite-elements; (c) the number of hyperradial points; and (d) the number of eigensolutions required. Test run requires 30 MB Classification: 2.1, 2.4 External routines: GAULEG and GAUSSJ [W.H. Press, B.F. Flanery, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterley, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986] Nature of problem: In the hyperspherical adiabatic approach [J. Macek, J. Phys. B 1 (1968) 831–843; U. Fano, Rep. Progr. Phys. 46 (1983) 97–165; C.D. Lin, Adv. Atom. Mol. Phys. 22 (1986) 77–142], a multi-dimensional Schrödinger equation for a two-electron system [A.G. Abrashkevich, D.G. Abrashkevich, M. Shapiro, Comput. Phys. Comm. 90 (1995) 311–339] or a hydrogen atom in magnetic field [M.G. Dimova, M.S. Kaschiev, S.I. Vinitsky, J. Phys. B 38 (2005) 2337–2352] is reduced by separating the radial coordinate ρ from the angular variables to a system of second-order ordinary differential equations which contain potential matrix elements and first-derivative coupling terms. The purpose of this paper is to present the finite-element method procedure based on the use of high-order accuracy approximations for calculating approximate eigensolutions for such systems of coupled differential equations. Solution method: The boundary problems for coupled differential equations are solved by the finite-element method using high-order accuracy approximations [A.G. Abrashkevich, D.G. Abrashkevich, M.S. Kaschiev, I.V. Puzynin, Comput. Phys. Comm. 85 (1995) 40–64]. The generalized algebraic eigenvalue problem AF = E BF with respect to pair unknowns ( E , F ) arising after the replacement of the differential problem by the finite-element approximation is solved by the subspace iteration method using the SSPACE program [K.J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis, Englewood Cliffs , Prentice–Hall, New York, 1982]. The generalized algebraic eigenvalue problem ( A − E B ) F = λ DF with respect to pair unknowns ( λ , F ) arising after the corresponding replacement of the scattering boundary problem in open channels at fixed energy value, E , is solved by the LDL T factorization of symmetric matrix and back-substitution methods using the DECOMP and REDBAK programs, respectively [K.J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice–Hall, New York, 1982]. As a test desk, the program is applied to the calculation of the energy values and reaction matrix for an exactly solvable 2D-model of three identical particles on a line with pair zero-range potentials described in [Yu. A. Kuperin, P.B. Kurasov, Yu.B. Melnikov, S.P. Merkuriev, Ann. Phys. 205 (1991) 330–361; O. Chuluunbaatar, A.A. Gusev, S.Y. Larsen, S.I. Vinitsky, J. Phys. A 35 (2002) L513–L525; N.P. Mehta, J.R. Shepard, Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 032728-1-11; O. Chuluunbaatar, A.A. Gusev, M.S. Kaschiev, V.A. Kaschieva, A. Amaya-Tapia, S.Y. Larsen, S.I. Vinitsky, J. Phys. B 39 (2006) 243–269]. For this benchmark model the needed analytical expressions for the potential matrix elements and first-derivative coupling terms, their asymptotics and asymptotics of radial solutions of the boundary problems for coupled differential equations have been produced with help of a MAPLE computer algebra system. Restrictions: The computer memory requirements depend on: • (a) the number of differential equations; • (b) the number and order of finite-elements; • (c) the total number of hyperradial points; and • (d) the number of eigensolutions required. Restrictions due to dimension sizes may be easily alleviated by altering PARAMETER statements (see Long Write-Up and listing for details). The user must also supply subroutine POTCAL for evaluating potential matrix elements. The user should supply subroutines ASYMEV (when solving the eigenvalue problem) or ASYMSC (when solving the scattering problem) that evaluate the asymptotics of the radial wave functions at the right boundary point in case of a boundary condition of the third type, respectively. Running time: The running time depends critically upon: • (a) the number of differential equations; • (b) the number and order of finite-elements; • (c) the total number of hyperradial points on interval [ 0 , ρ max ] ; and • (d) the number of eigensolutions required. The test run which accompanies this paper took 28.48 s without calculation of matrix potentials on the Intel Pentium IV 2.4 GHz.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Logiciel · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,065
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,219

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0030,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0650,030

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,301
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreLogiciel

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations46
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueComputer Physics CommunicationsMême sujetAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesTravaux en français237 207