Implementing Bottleneck Management Techniques and Establishing Quality of Sort Relationships to Improve Terminal Processing Capacity
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The importance of classification terminals to railroad network performance is well established. As the key control points, each terminal’s performance affects many aspects of network operations from freight car utilization to service reliability. The acceptance of scheduled railroading by all Class I railroad’s in North America has heightened the interaction between terminal performance and network operations. Terminal performance is strongly affected by terminal capacity which is defined as the upper limit on the throughput of a production process. Due to constraints on capital, railroads need to harness as much capacity as possible from existing infrastructure. It is estimated that reducing terminal dwell time can result in a 1530% terminal capacity improvement without a major capital investment. Because classification terminals can be considered production systems, insight into the dynamics of a terminal system can be gained by adopting a manufacturing systems management approach. This enables use of production control tools that have led to significant capacity and performance improvement in the manufacturing environment. This work focused on improving terminal performance by adapting the Hopp & Spearman concept of “Factory Physics,” Goldratt’s Theory of Constraints (TOC) and tools from Lean Manufacturing. The most important manufacturing process analog to improving terminal capacity is the bottleneck. In a production system the bottleneck is the process that limits its throughput. As such, the processing rate of the bottleneck sets the rate for the entire system. Improving the performance of the bottleneck is the best way to improve the performance of the entire terminal system. Value Stream Mapping and TOC were used to identify and understand the relationship between the bottleneck and the rest of the terminal system on two major North American railroads, CN and Canadian Pacific. The pull-down process has been identified as the bottleneck in a majority of classification terminals, including those of CN and Canadian Pacific. Both railroads are engaged in efforts to improve terminal performance. Techniques that have proven successful in improving bottleneck performance at terminals on both railroads are discussed in the context of TOC and Lean Manufacturing. The interaction between the hump and the pull-down process is discussed in the context of the factors that increase the workload of the pull-down crews. How well the cars are sorted in the classification yard directly impacts the performance of the pull-down process. Improving the Quality of Sort can translate into an increase in terminal processing capacity and is reflected in lower average dwell times. A metric for measuring the Quality of Sort in the bowl has been developed and its relationship to bowl volume established. Methods for implementing this metric at the production control level in a terminal are also discussed. What’s new? Application of the manufacturing methodologies of Factory Physics, Theory of Constraints and Lean Manufacturing to railroad terminal operations and development of a metric to measure the quality of the sorting process. The relationship between that metric and bowl volume has been established and related to improving terminal performance.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle