Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This book with its nine essays and well-crafted introduction resulted from papers presented at the 1996 conference of the Massachusetts Historical Society. David McCullough, the author of the currently popular biography of John Adams, gave the keynote address at the meeting and provided a positive comment for the book jacket. Collections of essays present well-known difficulties to the readers, but this one is much more tightly organized than most and is further strengthened by a strong introduction by its editor, Richard Alan Ryerson. Ryerson, instead of summarizing the individual essays, provides an analysis of the historiography of “Adams studies” and indicates where and how those essays fit in and what further work is required to complete the analysis of this extremely complex figure. The individual essays vary in quality but all of them give us new insights into our second president, first vice president, diplomat, political theorist, and congressman. William Pencak and John E. Ferling place Adams, along with Thomas Jefferson, in the context of colonials in a transatlantic empire. Both give us insights into his earlier career and point out paths to further research that would involve a careful analysis of how Adams's ambitions meshed with those of a wide assortment of his provincial colleagues. Gregg L. Lint analyzes Adams's earlier career as a diplomat from 1778 through the negotiations leading to the Treaty of Paris and interprets him as a bold advocate of an independent American foreign policy. Two very strong chapters by Jack D. Warren and Joanne B. Freeman examine his role as vice president and the election of 1796. Warren argues, quite convincingly, that Adams's overzealous efforts to increase the prestige of the president and executive in 1789 led George Washington to distrust his advice, while Freeman shows the most completely ad hoc personal and nonpartisan character of the election of 1796. After her analysis one is less surprised to remember that many fairly astute politicians believed that a reunion of Adams and Jefferson might be in the cards during early 1797. Richard Brown covers Adams's presidential years in terms of his complex and continuing ideas concerning the freedom of speech. Brown, correctly I believe, notes that his support and use of the sedition act did not represent a break with his more “radical” past but instead indicated a continuation of his earlier ideas. Edith Gelles presents a portrait of Abigail Adams as a first lady who not only knew politics but, in many instances, served as a confidante and sounding board for her husband.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».