First Report of <i>Colombian datura virus</i> in Brugmansia in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Colombian datura virus (CDV) was first described in 1968 (3) and has since been reported in Europe (4), Japan (see 4 for additional references), and the United States (1,2). CDV is a member of the family Potyviridae with flexuous, filamentous nucleocapsids that can be transmitted by mechanical inoculation and grafting and is known to be vectored by the common aphid Myzus persicae. In the fall of 2007, five Brugmansia plants of unknown species from a Parks Board Collection in a Lower Mainland nursery, British Columbia, Canada, were found to be displaying symptoms typical of a viral infection: chlorotic flecking and mottling on leaves, leaf shrivel, and vein banding. Symptomatic leaves from these five plants were tested by ELISA (Immuno Strip Test, Agdia, Elkhart, IN) for several common viruses including Impatiens necrotic spot, Tobacco mosaic, Cucumber mosaic, and Tomato spotted wilt viruses and found to be negative for all. However, rub inoculations onto the herbaceous indicators Nicotiana occidentalis and N. benthamiana resulted in severe symptom formation including necrosis, wilting, shriveling, stunted growth, petiole and stem tip collapse, as well as collapse from the base of the plants, and plant death within 2 weeks after inoculation. A leaf dip assay of the original infected Brugmansia sample and infected N. benthamiana tissue revealed flexuous, potyvirus-like particles with the electron microscope (EM). On the basis of the Brugmansia leaf symptoms and the EM results, a possible infection with CDV was suspected. Primers CDV-3 and CDV-NIb5, specific to CDV (4), were used in a reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay that amplified an approximate 1,600-bp fragment from the original Brugmansia sample and inoculated N. bentamiana and N. occidentalis plants. The amplified portion of the genome is the extreme 3' terminus and includes the 3' noncoding sequence, the viral coat protein gene, and part of the viral replicase gene. Fragments were cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) and two clones from each plant (total of six clones) were sequenced in both directions. Sequences of all clones were essentially identical, with only three nucleotide differences among the clones (GenBank Accession No. EU571230). BLASTn analysis revealed the highest match to several CDV isolates ranging from 98.7 to 99.5% nucleotide sequence identity. BLASTp analysis of the 451 amino acid viral polyprotein translation product gave a similarly high match with CDV isolates, with the highest match to a Hungarian isolate of CDV (GenBank Accession No. CAD26690) of 99.8% identity, or only one mismatch out of 451 amino acids. An additional group of 15 large symptomless Brugmansia plants, located approximately 6 m from the five symptomatic plants, were also tested by RT-PCR and found to be positive. These 15 plants were of a different but also unknown species of Brugmansia. In conclusion, analysis of symptomatic Brugmansia from a Canadian collection by transfer of disease to herbaceous indicators, EM, RT-PCR, and genomic sequence comparisons, are consistent with the detection and identification of the potyvirus Colombian datura virus. To our knowledge, this is the first report of this viral pathogen in Canada. References: (1) S. Adkins et al. Phytopathology (Abstr.) 95(suppl.):S2, 2005. (2) C. R. Fry et al. J. Phytopathol. 152:200, 2004. (3) R. P. Kahn and R. Bartels. Phytopathology 58:58, 1968. (4) J. Schubert et al. J. Phytopathol. 154:343, 2006.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».