Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Summer has arrived, at least in the Northern Hemisphere, and Winter has moved South to chill our cousins there. By the time you read this editorial half of 2005 will have come and gone. That means the Symposium on Advanced Wound Care (SAWC) and the Wound Healing Society (WHS) meetings will have taken place. In the latter half of 2005 we have the joint meeting of the European Wound Management Association (EWMA), European Tissue Repair Society (ETRS) and the German Society forWound Healing and Wound Treatment (DGfW) in Stuttgart, Wounds UK in Harrogate and the Canadian Association of Wound Care (CAWC) to look forward to and to show the degree of activity that exists in this emerging and popular subject. In the second edition of Volume 2 of the IWJ we continue to publish topics from authors from around the world to continue to support our goal of being a real international journal. We are continuing our efforts to further expand our progress in this internationalisation of wound healing. In this edition of the journal we have included a book review. We would like this to become a regular feature of the IWJ and as such if you know of a text which warrants review or indeed feel inclined to write one then please submit it through our usual e-mail address:submissions@internationalwoundjournal.com. Similarly, we always encourage letters, if you feel strongly about something then please put pen to paper. Indeed if you don’t want a letter published, but wish to express your views directly to the Editor-in-Chief or myself then please do so through our personal e-mails. If you have an idea of something you wish to see included in the IWJ then let us know! We would be pleased to hear from you. The IWJ will have a presence at the Stuttgart meeting as will our six Strategic Partners. Much will be going on including many satellite symposia bringing new and important information for all. Some of our Strategic Partners have provided advanced notice in this edition of the IWJ. Should you wish to attend any of these events then please speak directly with the Strategic Partner Company. Living in Toronto, Canada and working directly with Professor Gary Sibbald, I have first hand knowledge of the progress and effort being made for the WUWHS 2008 meeting. As you are aware from the last edition of the IWJ the next meeting of this group will be held in Toronto! Since our last update, the dates have been fixed; the venue secured – Toronto Convention Centre, 4–8 June 2008! Put these dates in your forward planner as I suppose that 2008 calendars are not even designed never mind printed at the moment. This is no excuse, however, to miss out on what will be the largest event in wound healing history. In addition a new logo has been designed for the meeting and you can see this as you browse this edition. Much work is ongoing to ensure societies, companies and delegates have an opportunity for participating in a global event that again emphasises the international nature of this subject. Prof. Zulifiqarali Abbas, Tanzania Prof. Bishara Atiyeh, Lebanon Dr Adrian Barbul, USA Suzie Calne, UK Dr Robertto Cassino, Italy Dr Celalettin Çelebi, Turkey Dr George Cherry, UK Dr Mike Clark, UK Dr Diane Cooper, USA Dr Ian Darby, Australia Dr Jeff Davidson, USA Dr Sebastian Debus, Germany Dr William Ennis, USA Dr Vincent Falanga, USA Dr Mieke Flour, Belgium Evonne Fowler, USA Prof. Peter Franks, UK Prof. Xiabong Fu, China Prof. Finn Gottrup, Denmark David Gray, UK Dr Satsue Hagisawa, Japan Dr Eva-Lisa Heinrichs, UK Dr Dirk Hollander, Germany Dr Pamela Houghton, Canada Prof. Kent Jönsson, Zimbabwe Dr David Keast, Canada Dr Kazuo Kishi, Japan Dr Diane Krasner, USA Dr Stephan Landis, Arab Emirates Prof. David Leaper, UK Dr Luis Fernando Lira, Mexico Dr Courtney Lyder, USA Dr Mario Marazzi, Italy Dr Sylvie Meaume, France Dr Joe McCulloch, USA Yvette Moulin, Canada Dr Manoj Pandey, India Nancy Parslow, Canada Prof. Hugo Partsch, Austria Prof. Hermelinda Pedrosa, Brazil Dr Elaine Pina, Portugal Dr Elia Ricci, Italy Dr Ricardo Roa, Chile Dr George Rodeheaver, USA Dr Jose Contreras Ruiz, Mexico Prof. Vijay Shukla, India Dr Mark Tang, Singapore Cath Vowden, UK Dr Peter Vowden, UK
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».