MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2118476644 · doi:10.1353/cch.2006.0010

Indigenous Women and Colonial Cultures: An Introduction

2005· article· en· W2118476644 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pamela Scully

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Colonialism and Colonial History · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueColonialism, slavery, and trade
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésColonialismIndigenousGender studiesIdeologySociologyScholarshipWhite (mutation)Privilege (computing)Human sexualityRace (biology)AnthropologyPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Indigenous Women and Colonial Cultures: An Introduction Pamela Scully In the last decade or so, colonial studies have undergone something of a revolution. Inspired by the work of Frantz Fanon and Albert Memmi, and informed by Joan Scott’s work on “gender as a useful category of historical analysis” scholars have analyzed the creation of colonial categories and identities and the psychic and cultural operations of sexuality and race.1 We now have a much better appreciation of how bureaucratic practices and discourses intrinsically shaped and depended upon social and cultural understandings of race, and of the place of white women in the colonial order.2 Rejecting older formulations of domination and resistance, writers have explored the mutually constitutive practices of colonial hierarchies within a wider colonial sphere. The articles that follow are clearly in debt to this literature with its emphasis on comparative colonial cultures, sexuality, and race.3 This special issue also seeks to depart from recent work on colonial cultures that seems implicitly to privilege for analysis the constitution and reproduction of whiteness. Scholars have analyzed the ways in which colonial orders sought to define through cultural practice who counted as European and who did not. Child-rearing techniques, the relationships of servants to children, the changing ideological meanings of concubinage and marriage, all these sites proved indeed powerful nodes at which whiteness was invented and protected, if always imperfectly. The scholarship concentrates in this regard on those individuals and processes, which most clearly threw concepts of “European” or “white” vis a vis “native” into relief. This work has vastly increased our understanding of the nuances and fragile borders of colonial hierarchy. As we know from the vast literature on slave and other societies, however, the dominated rarely shared the mythic beliefs in family and emotion articulated by the dominant.4 We also need to explore how the colonized experienced and helped constitute colonial cultures. As Karen Vieira Powers has pointed out, relatively little focus has been paid to indigenous women except as metaphors for the land or for colonial domination, the latter a key feature of early conquest and travel narratives from the Atlantic to the Pacific.5 The articles in this issue wrestle with the implications of recent authors’ challenge to historiography to try to render more subtly the landscape of women’s experiences of early colonial rule. The articles investigate the meanings of indigeneity and femaleness in emerging colonial cultures. They demonstrate the fluidity and importance of the category “indigenous woman” to colonialism. The articles cover various regions and periods: the earliest colonial encounters in the Atlantic World, the worlds of eighteenth century India and the Ohio Valley, families in nineteenth-century Canada and Britain and the colonial frontier of Queensland, Australia. Authors illuminate the complex lives of indigenous women in an era which witnessed the movement of European explorers and their military entourages, company rule, the more formal establishment of colonialism, and the triumph of settler capitalism. The focus on indigenous women as people in history, rather as metaphors for imperial exploration challenges us to find historical methods that enable us to read women’s experiences of history. We have to avoid rendering women’s lives within the victim/traitor dynamic that has shaped so much of the literature on indigenous women such as Malintzin. The articles that follow begin to outline how we might write histories of indigenous women in ways that work through and beyond the privileged analytical position given historically to sexuality, in order to explore the multifaceted lives of these women in colonial frontiers and colonial orders. Pamela Scully Emory University Endnotes 1. Frantz Fanon, Black Skins White Masks. Original publication 1952. Reissue Edition (New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1991); Albert Memmi, The Colonizer and The Colonized. Original publication 1965 (London: Earthscan, 2003); Joan Scott, “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis” American Historical Review, 91, 5 (Dec 1986): 1053–1073. 2. For excellent work on white women in the colonies see for example, Marilyn Boxer and Jean H. Quartert, eds, Connecting Spheres: European Women in a Globalizing World 1500 to the present (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000); Helen Calloway, Gender, Culture and Empire: European Women in Colonial Nigeria...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,953
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,258 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Colonialism and Colonial HistoryMême sujetColonialism, slavery, and tradeTravaux en français237 207