Official language minority communities in Canada : is official language minority-majority status associated with mental health problems and mental health service use?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Language is a key health determinant that may affect an individual's wellbeing and prevent access to health care services.1 Within Canada, official language use and minority-majority status differs provincially (French-majority/English-minority in Quebec and French-minority/English-majority outside of Quebec).Although the little research that is available indicates that health disparities may exist between French-and English-speaking Canadians, [2][3][4][5][6] the role of both language and minority-majority status has been neglected.Purpose: The first objectives of the current study was to determine whether disparities exist in mental health and mental health service use between minority and majority Canadian Francophone and Anglophone communities both within and outside of Quebec.The second objectives was to examine if official language minority-majority status was associated with the presence of common mental health problems and mental health service utilization.Methodology: The current study used data from the Canadian Community Health Survey: Mental Health and Well-being, Cycle 1.2.7 Two main comparisons were made: Quebec Francophones to Quebec Anglophones, and outside Quebec Francophones to outside Quebec Anglophones.Twelve-month and lifetime prevalences of mental disorders and mental health service use were examined through bivariate analyses.Logistic regression analyses determined whether official language minority-majority status significantly predicts mental health problems and mental health service use using the Determinants of Health Model 8-10 and Andersen's behavioural model.[11][12][13] Results: Very few significant differences were found between official language groups both outside and within Quebec, though some notable differences were found between Quebec and outside Quebec: Anglophones and Francophones outside Quebec had a higher prevalence of iii poor mental health and low life satisfaction compared their respective language counterparts in Quebec.Respondents from outside Quebec had a higher prevalence of consulting with a psychiatrist than respondents from Quebec.There was no significant association between membership in an Official Language Minority Community and mental health problems, and mental health service use.Implications: Although our results indicate that very few differences exist between official language minority and majority groups, these findings remain important and can help aid key stakeholders redirect resources and develop policies and programs towards areas and geographic locations wherein health disparities exist.Dr. Bonnie Janzen.Your expertise has been most valuable and you both have gone above and beyond to aid me in each step of this process.To Dr. Scott Patten, I am grateful for your participation as my external committee member.Without Statistics Canada, this project would not have been possible.Specifically, I would like to thank the Saskatchewan Research Data Centre and Jesse McCorsky who were extremely helpful and knowledgeable regarding all aspects of my analyses.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».