MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2120022978 · doi:10.4103/1673-5374.155421

Dendrite pathology and neurodegeneration: focus on mTOR

2015· article· en· W2120022978 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

RevueNeural Regeneration Research · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Établissements canadiensUniversité de Montréal
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNeurodegenerationNeuroscienceFocus (optics)MedicinePI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayPathologyBiologyDiseaseCell biologyPhysicsSignal transduction

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dendrites are exquisitely specialized cellular compartments that critically influence how neurons receive and process information. Most synaptic inputs are received onto dendritic shafts, or small protuberances known as dendritic spines, and are then integrated and transmitted to the cell soma. During nervous system development, dendrites are dynamic, expanding and retracting rapidly, in response to intrinsic and environmental cues. Selective elimination of dendritic processes, also known as developmental pruning, ensures precise connectivity and refines neuronal networks. In contrast, dendrites in adult neurons are extremely stable and do not change over long periods of time which, in humans, might span decades (Koleske, 2013). Emerging evidence reveals that dendritic arbor stability is crucial for adult brain function. Loss of stability leads to defects in dendrite structure and connectivity that contributes to the pathology of psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. Dendritic abnormalities and loss of synapses have been reported in schizophrenia and depression, as well as in neurodegenerative conditions including Alzheimer's disease (AD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke and glaucoma. Much of what is known about dendrite pathology and neurodegeneration comes from extensive analysis of dendritic abnormalities in human subjects with AD. Human neuropathology data reveal that dendritic defects in AD, which include dystrophic neurites, reduced arbor complexity and loss of spines, are widespread and occur early in the disease (Cochran et al., 2014). Computational modeling predicts that these structural changes can substantially disrupt signal integration and firing of action potentials, which might directly contribute to neural system failure and dementia. The “synaptic hypothesis” of AD is based on the premise that a reduction in dendritic spines, the primary sites of synaptic input, leads to early neuronal dysfunction (Selkoe, 2002). Therefore, the pathological outcome of many neurodegenerative conditions might not be primarily determined by cell loss, but by subtle changes in dendrites and spines/synapses that limit neuronal functionality within a circuit. Yet, little is known about the mechanisms that promote dendrite pathology and synapse loss during neurodegeneration. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase, which is well known for its function in the growth and proliferation of non-neuronal cells, has attracted substantial attention due to emerging roles in the developing nervous system (Jaworski and Sheng, 2006). mTOR is a key signal integrator for a variety of extracellular stimuli including growth factors, neurotransmitters, energy and stress. mTOR is stimulated by the availability of nutrients, while it is inhibited by cellular stressors such as hypoxia, inflammation or low ATP levels. The canonical mTOR pathway starts with receptor-mediated activation of phosphoinositide-3’ kinase (PI3K) and its downstream target Akt. Active Akt leads to phosphorylation and inhibition of the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC1/2), which results in increased GTP-bound Rheb protein and mTOR activation. Many of the signals that impinge upon mTOR activity act through the TSC1/2 complex, a negative regulator of mTOR function. For example, hypoxia activates TSC1/2 through the regulated in development and DNA damage response (REDD) proteins (Corradetti et al., 2005) leading to loss of mTOR function. In contrast, Akt and the extracellular-signal regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2), inactivate TSC1/2 leading to mTOR simulation. mTOR interacts with several intracellular partners to form the rapamycin-sensitive mTORC1 complex that controls multiple cellular processes of which the best characterized is protein synthesis. mTORC1 phosphorylates the p70 ribosomal S6 kinase (p70S6K) leading to phosphorylation of the ribosomal protein S6, which stimulates mRNA translation rate. In addition, mTORC1 phosphorylates 4E-BP1 thereby inhibiting its repression of eIF4E, which leads to enhanced initiation of translation. mTOR can also form the mTORC2 complex, which is rapamycin insensitive. mTORC2 phosphorylates Akt on serine 473 (S473), commonly used as a readout of mTORC2 activity, and its main role is the regulation of actin polymerization. Recent studies have identified mTOR as a critical component of dendrite development. For example, a substantial reduction in the number of dendritic branches and arbor shrinkage were observed in developing hippocampal neurons when mTOR was inhibited (Jaworski et al., 2005). mTOR has been implicated in the regulation of dendritic spine morphology, synaptogenesis and synaptic plasticity (Hoeffer and Klann, 2010). More recently, excessive mTORC1 activation and autophagy were linked to increased dendritic spine density and aberrant behavior in mouse models of autistic spectrum disorder (Tang et al., 2014). The emerging role of mTOR in the regulation of dendrite structure and spine dynamics during development led us to postulate that dysregulation of mTOR function might contribute to dendritic pathology in neurodegenerative diseases. To investigate this hypothesis, we focused on the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), a population of inner retinal neurons that convey visual information from the retina to the brain. The selective death of RGCs is a cardinal feature of glaucoma, and shrinkage of RGC dendritic arbors has been observed in primate, cat and rodent models of this disease as well as in human glaucomatous retinas. We used an in vivo model of acute optic nerve lesion (axotomy) to determine whether axonal damage had a direct effect on RGC dendrite morphology and, if so, to identify the molecular pathways that regulate this injury-induced response. We carried out a detailed analysis of dendritic structure in transgenic mice that selectively express yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in RGCs under control of the RGC-specific Thy1 promoter. In this strain (B6.Cg.Tg[Thy1-YFPH]2Jrs/J) less than 1% of RGCs are YFP-labeled allowing visualization of individual dendritic trees without interference from overlapping dendrites in neighboring neurons. YFP fills the entire RGC dendritic tree providing a Golgi-like stain suitable for acquisition of high resolution images by confocal microscopy and three-dimensional reconstruction with imaging software. Using this approach, we demonstrated that axonal injury triggered rapid shrinkage of RGC dendrites accompanied by marked reduction of arbor field area and complexity. Retinal immunohistochemistry using antibodies that recognize phosphorylated S6(Ser240/244), a widely accepted functional readout of mTORC1 activity, demonstrated that selective damage to RGC axons led to downregulation of mTORC1 function in these neurons but not in other retinal cells (Morquette et al., 2015). This observation is consistent with a previous study showing phospho-S6 downregulation in axotomized RGCs (Park et al., 2008). Importantly, we showed that optic nerve lesion led to selective upregulation of REDD2, a potent mTORC1 inhibitor, which coincided with loss of mTORC1 activity. REDD2 knockdown using targeted siRNA restored mTORC1 function in injured neurons and fully rescued their dendritic arbors, increasing dendritic length, field area and branch complexity. REDD2 depletion also abrogated pathological RGC hyperexcitability, restoring light-triggered responses, and extended cell survival after axotomy (Morquette et al., 2015). Rapamycin administration obliterated the effect of REDD2 knockdown confirming that dendritic rescue was mediated by mTORC1. In summary, our study demonstrates that damage to RGC axons leads to a cell-specific increase in REDD2, mTORC1 inhibition, and dendritic retraction. These findings provide evidence that REDD2-dependent loss of mTORC1 function can underlie RGC dendrite pathology, and that mTORC1 activity is required for the stability of adult RGC dendrites and cell survival. Based on these observations, we propose a working model in which several key pathways such as Akt, Erk1/2, and nutrients, converge in healthy RGCs to maintain endogenous levels of mTOR that drive protein synthesis, dendrite stability and synaptic integrity. In sick neurons afflicted by axonal injury, which are more vulnerable to stressors including hypoxia, low energy, reactive oxygen species and mechanical stress, mTOR inhibitors are upregulated leading to dendrite degeneration and synapse loss (Figure 1). REDD2 levels increase with hypoxia, via the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α), as well as oxidative and osmotic stress. Optic nerve damage increases HIF-1α and reactive oxygen species in RGCs (Kanamori et al., 2010), which may account for the axotomy-induced upregulation of REDD2. REDD2 has also been shown to promote human monocyte cell death through a reduction in thioredoxin-1 expression (Imen et al., 2009), thus we cannot rule out that REDD2 knockdown leading to downregulation of this pathway contributes to RGC dendrite protection. Although our study focused on REDD2, it is possible that other stress response proteins, which also inhibit mTOR, play a role in the context of different injury modalities or neurodegenerative diseases (Figure 1). Given that mTOR is a versatile, central regulator that responds to a variety of stressors, it is tempting to speculate that stress signals thought to contribute to RGC damage in glaucoma, including hypoxia, nutrient deprivation and reactive oxygen species, might do so by inhibiting mTOR function in these neurons, thereby triggering early dendritic retraction, synaptic disconnection and neurodegeneration.Figure 1: A model of dendrite retraction triggered by injury-related stressors.In sick neurons afflicted by axonopathy and more vulnerable to hypoxia, low energy, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mechanical stress, mTOR inhibitors are upregulated leading to dendrite retraction, loss of synapses and neurodegeneration. Healthy neurons, on the other hand, maintain constitutive levels of mTOR that drive protein synthesis, dendrite stability and synaptic integrity.mTOR: Mammalian target of rapamycin; RGCs: retinal ganglion cells; AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; Redd1/2: regulated in development and DNA damage response 1/2; PTEN: phosphatase and tensin homolog; TSC: tuberous sclerosis complex; ERK1/2: extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2; mTORC1: mTOR complex 1; LST8: lethal with SEC13 protein 8; PRAS40: proline rich Akt substrate 40 kDa.Further research is required to identify mTOR-specific targets that contribute to RGC dendrite stability. It is possible that mTOR mediates the translation of structural or signaling proteins in dendrites to ensure arbor maintenance and synaptic integrity. Two well characterized mTOR targets, p70S6K and 4E-BP1, play crucial roles in dendritic arborization during hippocampal neuron development (Jaworski et al., 2005). It is of future interest to assess whether these and other molecules involved in dendrite stability in developing neurons, such as the microtubule associated proteins (MAP) 1A and 2, integrin α3β1, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II, nuclear Dbf2-related kinases and the guanine deaminase cypin, are abnormally regulated in the context of glaucoma or other neurodegenerative diseases (Koleske, 2013). mTOR has also been shown to enhance the interaction between microtubules and actin-binding proteins required for proper dendritic arbor morphology (Swiech et al., 2011), suggesting a role beyond that of protein translation. The identification of pathways that contribute to RGC dendritic arbor maintenance, including those upstream and downstream of mTOR, will be essential to understand the molecular basis of pathological changes in glaucoma and to identify therapeutic targets potentially applicable to other neurodegenerative diseases. This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to ADP and the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS). ADP holds a National Chercheur Boursier award from FRQS. The author thanks Dr. Timothy E Kennedy for helpful comments on the manuscript, and Mr. James Correia for assistance with the preparation of the figure. Due to space limitations, the author regrets the omission of many important studies and their corresponding references.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,682

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,282
Tête enseignante GPT0,442
Écart entre enseignants0,160 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle