Development of rainfall intensity duration frequency curves for the City of London under the changing climate
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The main focus of this study is the analysis of short duration high intensity rainfall for London, Ontario under the conditions of the changed climate. Predicted future climate change impacts for Southwestern Ontario include higher temperatures and increases in precipitation, leading to an intensification of the hydrologic cycle. One of the expected consequences of change is an increase in the magnitude and frequency of extreme events (e.g. high intensity rainfall, flash flooding, severe droughts, etc.). Changes in extreme events are of particular importance to the design, operation and maintenance of municipal water management infrastructure.\nMunicipal water management infrastructure (sewers, storm water management ponds or detention basins, street curbs and gutters, catchbasins, swales, etc) designs are typically based on the use of local rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency (IDF) curves. IDF curves are developed using historical rainfall time series data. Annual extreme rainfall is fitted to a theoretical probability distribution from which rainfall intensities, corresponding to particular durations, are obtained. In the use of this procedure an assumption is made that historic extremes can be used to characterize extremes of the future (i.e., the historic record is assumed to be stationary). This assumption is not valid under changing climatic conditions that may bring shifts in the magnitude and frequency of extreme rainfall. Such shifts in extreme rainfall at the local level demand new regulations for water infrastructure management as well as changes in design practices. The objective of this report is to assess the change in IDF curves for use by the City of London under changing climatic conditions.\nThe methodology implemented to assess changes in rainfall magnitude resulting from climate change includes the following components: (a) Development and use of a daily weather generator model for synthetic generation of rainfall under current and future climates; (b) Disaggregation of daily rainfall into hourly; (c) Statistical analysis of rainfall of various durations, and development of IDF curves under changed climatic conditions; (d) Comparative analysis of IDF curves; and (e) Recommendation for possible modification of municipal infrastructure design standards.\nThe two IDF curves currently used by the City of London (i.e., MacLauren IDF curve for design of conveyance systems, and Atmospheric Environment Service IDF curve for storm water management facilities) could have not be reproduced in this research using the data currently available from Meteorological Service of Canada. The IDF curves in use by the City are based on data sets that are no longer available. In addition, methods used by either MacLauren or Meteorological Service of Canada to estimate rainfall quantiles for durations shorter than one hour are not available. Therefore, comparing the IDF curves generated in this research to those currently used by the City of London is not appropriate. More confidence is placed in the relative difference between the three scenarios generated in this research: simulated historic climate (no change), and wet and dry climates (change guided by outputs of global circulation model outputs).\nThe results of simulations in this research indicate that rainfall magnitude (as well as intensity) will be different than historically observed. The climate change scenario recommended for use in the evaluation of storm water management design standards (i.e., the wet scenario) reveals a significant increase in rainfall magnitude (and intensity) for a range of durations and return periods. This increase has major implications on the ways in which current (and future) municipal water management infrastructure is designed, operated, and maintained. The main recommendation from this work is that the design standards and guidelines currently employed by the City of London be reviewed and/or revised in light of the information presented in this report.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».