Women???s Experience of Maternal Serum Screening
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Maternal serum screening (MSS) is an increasingly popular measure for detecting Down syndrome, trisomy 18, and open neural tube defects antenatally. Several studies, however, have demonstrated that women in general do not know much about the disorders being screened for or the meaning of the results. Therefore, focus groups were conducted at six sites across the province of Ontario, Canada; sites included northern, rural, urban, suburban, and inner-city communities. Each group comprised 10 women (on average), who were interviewed using a semistructured guide to explore their ideas, feelings, and views about MSS. The 60 participants, who were 16 to 44 years old, had recently given birth but were not currently pregnant. They had an average of two children and, with two exceptions, were married. More than half of the women had completed some type of postsecondary education. Some women had a definite need to be reassured about their infants’ well-being, whereas others were willing to “let nature take its course” and confront the outcome. Views about abortion and the ethics of prenatal genetic testing varied widely. Some women believed it was wrong to bring disabled children into the world. Others were concerned about intolerance of an “imperfect” child. Decisions were influenced by the woman’s or her partner’s perceived ability to cope with a child who has Down syndrome. Personal values aside, women depended on their sources of social support (partners, relatives, and friends) for help in making decisions. Participants wished to receive information primarily from their physicians and in an accurate and unbiased manner. They wanted to receive information on genetic screening as early as possible during their prenatal care, preferably at the fist or second visit. They wanted to know what the test could tell them, the positive and negative aspects of testing, how to interpret the results, and all options available, including abortion. Women wanted their physicians to convey the test results, whether positive or negative, in an accurate and timely manner. Women were opposed to being contacted only if the results were abnormal.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,019 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».