From motivation to passion: In search of the motivational processes involved in a meaningful life.
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract In this address, I present an overview of research on motivational processes that has been conducted by my research team over past 30 years. Such research subscribes to an organismic view of human motivation wherein people are seen as active agents who strive to fulfill their potential. Four lines of research are briefly presented: (a) role of social factors in intrinsic motivation; (b) determinants and outcomes of motivational processes in real-life settings; (c) an integrative perspective on role of personality, task, and social factors in motivational processes and outcomes (the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation); and (d) a new perspective on passion for life activities (the dualistic model on passion). Key studies are highlighted and some conclusions are drawn. Keywords: passion, motivation, self-determination theory, positive psychology Donald O. Hebb was an outstanding scientist and a visionary on contribution of psychology to human condition. It is thus with great honour that I receive 201 1 Donald O. Hebb Award for distinguished contributions to psychology as a science. I accept this award as captain of my research team. Without contribution of all team members, die research conducted over years could not have been done. I also see this award as positive feedback on quality of research in which Canadian motivation researchers engage (to this effect, see 2008 special issue of Canadian Psychology edited by Vallerand, Pelletier, & Koestner, 2008). For last 30 years or so, my research and that of my colleagues has focused on scientific study of motivational processes. This address charts progress that my own thinking and that of my colleagues have gone through during this period. While I review some of our research conducted over 1980-2010 period, I also reflect upon Zeitgeist of time during which such research was conducted. Thus, present article may also provide a fertile background to reexamine evolution of human motivation research during mis period. In doing so, I focus on four lines of research: (a) role of social factors in intrinsic and extrinsic motivation; (b) determinants and outcomes of motiprocesses in real-life settings; (c) an integrative perspecon die role of personality, task, and social factors in motivational processes and outcomes; and finally (d) a new perspective passion for life activities. As we shall see, there is a link across four research thrusts: search for motivational proinvolved in living a meaningful life. The Role of Social Factors in Intrinsic Motivation Motivation can be defined as: the hypothetical construct used describe internal and/or external forces that produce direction, intensity, and persistence of behaviour & Thill, 1993, p. 18; translated from French). Motivahas been studied from several perspectives. For example, perspectives have focused on instinctual drives (e.g., Freud, 1962/1923), whereas others have focused on environmental con(Skinner, 1953). While radically different, these two nevertheless share a fundamental assumption: people are organisms who merely react to internal or external stimuli. subscribe to a more comprehensive theoretical perspective that individual as an active organism striving for effective with environment in hope of growing as an (see Deci, 1980; Deci & Ryan, 1985, 2000; Vallerand, 1997) and living a meaningful life (Seligman & Csiksentmihalyi, This organismic metafheoretical approach has guided much my conceptual thinking. Over years, researchers have come to identify two major of motivated behavior. The first deals with behavior perfor itself, in order to experience pleasure and satisfaction in activity, and has been called intrinsic motivation 1975). The second, which involves performing behavior in order to achieve some separable goal such as receiving rewards or avoiding punishment, has been termed extrinsic motivation (Deci, 1980, Deci & Ryan 1985). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle