MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2121329059 · doi:10.3828/bjcs.19.2.11

Human Rights Codes: Are They Ready for Today's Challenges?

2006· article· en· W2121329059 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
ONS Mayann Francis

Notice bibliographique

RevueBritish Journal of Canadian Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLegal Issues in South Africa
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMandateHuman rightsCommissionNova scotiaEquity (law)Political scienceSociologyLawWork (physics)Engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

One of the most challenging aspects of my work with the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission (NSHRC) is the opportunity to reach new audiences and engage them in a thoughtful dialogue about the importance of human rights issues. Each new audience poses different questions and contexts in which to carry on this dialogue. Amazingly, while the locales may change, the issues themselves are not really all that different. Equality and the freedom to build a future for ourselves and our communities are common values I believe are shared the world over. The groundwork for this article was actually laid some years ago by one of my colleagues from the NSHRC. Viki Samuels, Coordinator of Race Relations and Affirmative Action, was at Queen's University Belfast in November 2000 talking about the work of her division and the challenges and opportunities which a diverse society can bring. I like to call Ms Samuels' work the leading edge of human rights in Nova Scotia. Instead of waiting for issues of discrimination to be brought forward by complainants, her division is reaching out to all the various sectors of Nova Scotian society and encouraging them to protect equity and fairness before discrimination can become an issue. When I came to the NSHRC in August 1999, I knew that I was going to have to roll up my sleeves - a lot of work needed to be done. As Director and CEO, I came with a mandate to create change within the organisation because a cultural shift was needed. We needed to become more customerfocused and more efficient at what we were doing. We needed to expand our gaze beyond reactive work, to work which anticipated the change happening around us. By making that shift we could become agents of positive change for Nova Scotia. The work of Ms Samuels' division is enabling that positive change. One of the first things I did as CEO was to initiate a comprehensive organisational review of the Commission, its first since it was created in the late 1960s. That review meant taking a hard look at our current practices and resources and making sure they matched the external climate. When the Nova Scotia Human Rights Act and the NSHRC were created the intention was to help combat the discrimination which had marginalised communities of people such as African Nova Scotians and aboriginals. Three decades later we need to ask the question, 'Were we doing that job well enough?' A lot has changed in the intervening thirty years. Both complainants and respondents are more aware of their rights, thanks to the advent of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ('the Charter') and the reach of the media. And now immigration is a more important factor to counter the ageing of our population. In Nova Scotia, we have one of the highest occurrences of disability in Canada - 17.1 per cent in 2001 (Statistics Canada 2002) - making issues of accessibility of critical importance. These and other factors challenge the NSHRC to evolve and keep pace with change. One thing I believe passionately is that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. It is far better for the NSHRC to be engaging business and community leaders in a dialogue that promotes positive change instead of waiting for issues to be brought to us requiring investigation of complaints of discrimination. Surely we have become smart enough in this new century to realise that racism, sexism, classism and all those other 'isms' not only are a moral blemish on our societies, but harm all of us by diminishing our well-being on the social and economic level. At the beginning of this article, I mentioned how interconnected our world is. 'Globalisation' is a fashionable phrase used to describe the intricate web of relationships that binds Canada with the United Kingdom and both of us to the rest of the globe. People, money and resources flow in ways which could never have been imagined even fifty years ago. Along with the material aspects of a globalised society, human rights continue to occupy an ever more important role. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,023
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,973
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,462

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0230,061
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0140,050
Communication savante0,0270,029
Science ouverte0,0030,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0150,023
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,080
Tête enseignante GPT0,344
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBritish Journal of Canadian StudiesMême sujetLegal Issues in South AfricaTravaux en français237 207