MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2121441400 · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2008.02.006

Methicillin‐Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>

2008· editorial· en· W2121441400 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
James H. Lubowitz, Gary G. Poehling

Notice bibliographique

RevueArthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery · 2008
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStaphylococcus aureusMicrobiologyMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusMedicineBiologyBacteria

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Managed care. Malpractice. Malingering. Medicine might be more marvelous minus this medley of “m”s. And now: MRSA. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Mmmm …. Michael Pollan, bestselling author and professor of journalism at the University of California, Berkeley, where he is also director of the Knight Program in Science and Environmental Journalism, reported in the December 16, 2007 The New York Times Magazine that “MRSA, the very scary antibiotic-resistant strain of Staphylococcus bacteria … is now killing more Americans each year than AIDS—100,000 infections leading to 19,000 deaths in 2005, according to estimates in The Journal of the American Medical Association. For years now, drug-resistant staph infections have been a problem in hospitals, where the heavy use of antibiotics can create resistant strains of bacteria. It's Evolution 101: the drugs kill off all but the tiny handful of microbes that, by dint of a chance mutation, possess genes allowing them to withstand the onslaught; these hardy survivors then get to work building a drug-resistant superrace. The methicillin-resistant staph that first emerged in hospitals as early as the 1960s posed a threat mostly to elderly patients. But a new and even more virulent strain—called ‘community-acquired MRSA'—is now killing young and otherwise healthy people who haven't set foot in a hospital. No one is yet sure how or where this strain evolved, but it is sufficiently different from the hospital-bred strains to have some researchers looking elsewhere for its origin.”1Pollan M. The way we live now: Our decrepit food factories. The New York Times Magazine December 16, 2007.http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/16/magazine/16wwln-lede-t.htmlGoogle Scholar Also as reviewed in The New York Times,2Wener K. Health Guide: MRSA infection. The New York Times Health Guide Reviewed November 9, 2005.http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/mrsa-infection/overview.html?8qa&scp=1-spot&sq=MRSA&st=nytGoogle Scholar “MRSA infection is an infection with a strain of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria that is resistant to antibiotics known as beta-lactams. These antibiotics include methicillin, amoxicillin, and penicillin. Staphylococcus aureus (‘staph') are common bacteria that normally live on the skin. The bacteria also live harmlessly in the nasal passages of roughly 30% of the U.S. population. Staph can cause infection when they enter the skin through a cut or sore. Infection can also occur when the bacteria move inside of the body through a catheter or breathing tube. The infection can be minor and local (for example, a pimple), or more serious. “Most staph infections occur in people with weak immune systems, usually patients in hospitals and long-term care facilities. MRSA infections in hospitalized patients are known as healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA). People who have been hospitalized or had surgery within the past year are at high risk for HA-MRSA. People receiving certain treatments, such as dialysis, are also at high risk. MRSA bacteria account for a large percentage of hospital-acquired staph infections.2Wener K. Health Guide: MRSA infection. The New York Times Health Guide Reviewed November 9, 2005.http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/mrsa-infection/overview.html?8qa&scp=1-spot&sq=MRSA&st=nytGoogle Scholar “Over the past several years, MRSA infections in people not considered high-risk have increased. These infections, known as community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA), occur in otherwise healthy people who have no history of hospitalization in the last year. Many such infections have occurred among athletes who share equipment or personal items (such as towels or razors) and children in daycare facilities.”2Wener K. Health Guide: MRSA infection. The New York Times Health Guide Reviewed November 9, 2005.http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/mrsa-infection/overview.html?8qa&scp=1-spot&sq=MRSA&st=nytGoogle Scholar Notably, “Few antibiotics are available to treat more serious MRSA infections. These include vancomycin (Vancocin, Vancoled), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim, Bactrim DS, Septra, Septra DS), and linezolid (Zyvox).”2Wener K. Health Guide: MRSA infection. The New York Times Health Guide Reviewed November 9, 2005.http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/mrsa-infection/overview.html?8qa&scp=1-spot&sq=MRSA&st=nytGoogle Scholar Worse, in 2008, news of a new, multidrug-resistant strain of CA-MRSA was reported in the New York Times.3Altman L.K. New bacteria strain is striking gay men. The New York Times January 15, 2008.http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/health/15infe.htmlGoogle Scholar Citing a study reported in the Annals of Internal Medicine,4Diep B.A. Chambers H.F. Graber C.J. Emergence of multidrug-resistant, community-associated, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone USA300 in men who have sex with men.Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148 (online) (Accessed Jan 26, 2008)http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/0000605-200802190-00204v1Crossref PubMed Scopus (337) Google ScholarThe Times reports that “the authors warned that unless microbiology laboratories were able to identify the strain and doctors prescribed the proper antibiotic therapy, the infection could soon spread and become a wider threat.”3Altman L.K. New bacteria strain is striking gay men. The New York Times January 15, 2008.http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/health/15infe.htmlGoogle Scholar Again, notably, “A single clone of community-associated MRSA, USA300, was not seen before 2000 but is now widely disseminated in 38 U.S. states, Canada, and 9 European Union countries and can cause unusually severe human diseases, including necrotizing fasciitis, sepsis, endocarditis, and pneumonia. Infections occur predominantly among healthy, community-dwelling persons lacking traditional risk factors for MRSA. Whereas hospital-associated MRSA strains are resistant to multiple antimicrobial classes, USA300 and other community-associated MRSA strains are typically resistant to β-lactams and 1 or 2 other drug classes … (however) a multidrug-resistant USA300 (has) accumulated multiple resistance genes, rendering it resistant to β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, tetracycline, macrolide, clindamycin, and mupirocin.”4Diep B.A. Chambers H.F. Graber C.J. Emergence of multidrug-resistant, community-associated, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone USA300 in men who have sex with men.Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148 (online) (Accessed Jan 26, 2008)http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/0000605-200802190-00204v1Crossref PubMed Scopus (337) Google Scholar While bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a problem well know to readers of Arthroscopy, we find the epidemic of MRSA to be of particular clinical concern. Readers should thus note, in the current issue, the report of “MRSA-Induced Septic Arthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” by Kurokouchi et al.5Kurokouchi K. Takahashi S. Yamada T. Yamamoto H. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus–induced septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Arthroscopy. 2008; 24: 615-617Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar To the authors' knowledge, it is the first report of this complication in the English-language literature. Readers should especially note that, in contrast to the typical clinical course of joint sepsis after ACL reconstruction—resolution of sepsis with graft salvage when arthroscopic lavage and debridement and antibiotic treatment is initiated within 1 week after index surgery—in the reported case, multiple operations, graft and hardware removal, and administration of antibiotics for over a month were required until C-reactive protein levels “became negative.” Based on the reports from the lay press,1Pollan M. The way we live now: Our decrepit food factories. The New York Times Magazine December 16, 2007.http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/16/magazine/16wwln-lede-t.htmlGoogle Scholar, 2Wener K. Health Guide: MRSA infection. The New York Times Health Guide Reviewed November 9, 2005.http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/mrsa-infection/overview.html?8qa&scp=1-spot&sq=MRSA&st=nytGoogle Scholar, 3Altman L.K. New bacteria strain is striking gay men. The New York Times January 15, 2008.http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/health/15infe.htmlGoogle Scholar the internal medicine literature,4Diep B.A. Chambers H.F. Graber C.J. Emergence of multidrug-resistant, community-associated, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone USA300 in men who have sex with men.Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148 (online) (Accessed Jan 26, 2008)http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/0000605-200802190-00204v1Crossref PubMed Scopus (337) Google Scholar and our own journal,5Kurokouchi K. Takahashi S. Yamada T. Yamamoto H. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus–induced septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Arthroscopy. 2008; 24: 615-617Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google ScholarArthroscopy readers are cautioned to have a heightened index of suspicion for MRSA as a potential cause of joint or systemic sepsis. Risk factors for HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA have been recently reviewed in the Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons6Marcotte A. Trzeciak M. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An emerging pathogen in orthopaedics.J Am Assoc Orthop Surg. 2008; 16: 98-106PubMed Google Scholar and are summarized in Table 1.Table 1Risk Factors for MRSAHA-MRSA Hospitalization, surgery, dialysis, or residence in a long-term care facility within 1 year Permanent indwelling catheter or percutaneous medical device Previous MRSA Proximity to or contact with a patient colonized or infected with MRSA Recent antimicrobial therapyCA-MRSA Athletes in contact sports (e.g., basketball, fencing, football, rugby, volleyball, weightlifting, wrestling) Children in day care Homeless persons Intravenous drug users Men who have sex with men Military recruits Alaskan natives Native Americans Pacific Islanders Prison inmates Antibiotic use within the preceding year Close, crowded living conditions Compromised skin integrity Contact with contaminated surfaces (e.g., wrestling mats) Frequent skin-to-skin contact Shared items Suboptimal cleanlinessData from Marcotte et al.6Marcotte A. Trzeciak M. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An emerging pathogen in orthopaedics.J Am Assoc Orthop Surg. 2008; 16: 98-106PubMed Google Scholar Open table in a new tab Data from Marcotte et al.6Marcotte A. Trzeciak M. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An emerging pathogen in orthopaedics.J Am Assoc Orthop Surg. 2008; 16: 98-106PubMed Google Scholar If MRSA is suspected, readers should notify their institutional microbiology laboratory of the concern with a goal of allowing the laboratory to more rapidly identify the specific bacterial strain and sensitivity so that proper antibiotic therapy can be prescribed. Pending such identification, prophylactic implementation of antimicrobial agents that will specifically cover MRSA is recommended6Marcotte A. Trzeciak M. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An emerging pathogen in orthopaedics.J Am Assoc Orthop Surg. 2008; 16: 98-106PubMed Google Scholar in consultation with the pharmacy, the microbiology laboratory, and infectious disease, internal medicine, and/or primary care services. In addition, measures recommended to control MRSA infections in hospital and elective surgical settings include written MRSA standards, cohort nursing, nonselective screening of all admissions to orthopaedic wards, screening and decolonization of all patients having elective orthopedic procedures (especially those including prosthetic implants), use of polymerase chain reaction as a diagnostic tool, ring-fencing of beds, separate wound-dressing rooms for each ward, signal-colored isolation gowns and storage carts facilitating the use of separate supplies for patients with MRSA, intensified surveillance and feedback of MRSA data, “flagging” of formerly positive MRSA patients, gendine antiseptic dye coating of orthopaedic implants, and perioperative prophylaxis using nasal mupirocin and topical triclosan.7Hassan K. Koh C. Karunaratne D. Hughes C. Giles S. Financial implications of plans to combat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in an orthopaedic department.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007; 89: 668-671Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar, 8Trautmann M. Pollitt A. Loh U. et al.Implementation of an intensified infection control program to reduce MRSA transmissions in a German tertiary care hospital.Am J Infect Control. 2007; 35: 643-649Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar, 9Bahna P. Dvorak T. Hanna H. Yasko A.W. Hachem R. Raad I. Orthopaedic metal devices coated with a novel antiseptic dye for the prevention of bacterial infections.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007; 29: 593-596Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar, 10Shams W. Rapp R. Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections: An important consideration for orthopedic surgeons.Orthopedics. 2004; 27: 565-568PubMed Google Scholar, 11Fawley W. Parnell P. Hall J. Wilcox M. Surveillance for mupirocin resistance following introduction of routine peri-operative prophylaxis with nasal mupirocin.J Hosp Infect. 2006; 62: 327-332Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar Readers are encouraged to carefully review the cited references and to determine the incidence and susceptibility of HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA in their local communities in order to develop clinically relevant, evidence-based protocols for MRSA prophylaxis and treatment. While we agree with Michael Pollan that MRSA is “scary,” we advocate action as opposed to fear. Mindful management of MRSA may minimize morbidity and mortality. Mmmm ….

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,390
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,871

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,3900,207

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,267
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related SurgeryMême sujetAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusTravaux en français237 207