New insights into the lithosphere beneath the Superior Province from Rayleigh wave dispersion and receiver function analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Summary We present new models of shear wave velocity structure of the lithosphere and upper mantle beneath northern and eastern Ontario and surrounding regions. The study area is dominated by the Archean Superior Province, with Proterozoic orogenic belts to the south and southeast. Over the course of ∼3 Ga, the region has been shaped by accretionary and orogenic events, periods of rifting and the influence of a number of mantle hotspots. New data from the broad-band POLARIS/FedNor seismic network, along with permanent stations of the Canadian National Seismograph Network, are used for a seismic study of the crust and upper mantle beneath the region. This article concentrates primarily on a study of the upper mantle, carried out using two-station phase velocity analysis of teleseismic Rayleigh waves. Dispersion curves were measured for 100 two-station paths across the region, of which 30 were analysed to give 1-D path-averaged models of shear wave velocity structure. Dispersion measurements yielded phase velocity data for periods from ∼25 to ∼170 s, allowing us to resolve shear wave velocities to a depth of ∼300 km. The dispersion curves indicate an upper-mantle structure broadly characteristic of continental shield regions, but there are significant variations in the properties of the data across the province. In the central and western Superior Province, inferred lithospheric thicknesses vary between approximately 140 and 200 km. In general, the models are characterized by a well-developed ‘lid’ of high-velocity mantle underlain by a zone of reduced velocity. The highest lid velocities are modelled along a path whose azimuth corresponds to the fast direction of anisotropy resolved through SKS splitting analysis. The far northeast of Ontario has the thickest (∼220–240 km) lithospheric lid. Eastern Ontario has a complex structure that gives rise to a large variation in the structures modelled from the two-station paths. Apparent lithospheric thicknesses range from ∼100 to ∼220 km. This large variation is interpreted to arise from highly heterogeneous mantle structure and/or anisotropy across the Abitibi Greenstone Belt, the Southern Province, and the Proterozoic Grenville Province. Receiver function analysis shows variations in Moho depth and bulk Poisson's Ratio in the Superior Province crust. The crustal thickness varies from ∼34 to ∼44 km through most of the province, with a zone of anomalously thick crust (48 km) in the Kapuskasing Structural Zone region. Measurements of bulk Poisson's Ratio indicate that the crust is highly felsic in some parts of the province, but includes a significant mafic component in parts of the western Superior and eastern Ontario, regions that have been affected by uplift or rifting. The new results, together with information from other recent studies of shear wave splitting and body-wave tomography, show that the Superior craton is far from a homogeneous entity. Rather it is divisible, on the basis of thickness, anisotropy and velocity structure of the crust and lithosphere, into distinct subdomains that reflect the complex tectonic history of this region. The large range of inferred thicknesses of the crust (34–48 km) and lithosphere (100–240 km) within the Superior craton represents a significantly greater variability than has been previously observed for Archean lithosphere.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».