MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2122077064 · doi:10.1186/1478-811x-1-2

Building a Solid Foundation: CCS in Developing Skeleton and the CCN Family Role

2003· editorial· en· W2122077064 sur OpenAlexaff
Herman Yeger

Notice bibliographique

RevueCell Communication and Signaling · 2003
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueConnective Tissue Growth Factor Research
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids Foundation
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExtracellular matrixCell biologyCartilageProcess (computing)BiologyNeuroscienceChemistryAnatomyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The inauguration of Cell Communication & Signaling includes the introduction of a Commentary section which will identify concepts and current research of interest to the readership. In this first Commentary I have highlighted the complex processes of cartilage and bone formation and the potential role of the CCN family of proteins, in particular CCN2 (CTGF). We invite authors of papers cited and other investigators interested in the subject areas to submit further insights via the Commentary section and indeed in this manner to help develop a lively forum for discussion and interaction. In its simplest organizational perspective, a committed mesenchyme initiates formation of cartilage where differentiating chondroblasts progress to become chondrocytes and in doing so lay down a highly specialized extracellular matrix. Hypertrophy of one zone of chondrocytes and death through apoptosis set the framework for ensuing stages in osteogenesis, beginning with a scaffold for growing bone, and then vascularization of the territory which then brings in osteoblasts and osteoclasts to initiate formation of trabecular bone further remodeling and therein the development of a second prominent and unique extracellular matrix. The list of morphogenetic factors, growth factors, steroids and key transcription factors that orchestrate this complex process is already extensive and continues to grow, almost mimicking the process itself [1,2]. Outside to inside and vice versa signaling events are critical to the process of cartilage and bone formation since the different cell populations involved must coordinate their activities in order to realize the ultimate anatomical structure. Thus it is not surprising that disruptions in these intricate communications and loss of factors would lead to development of mild to severe abnormalities. Add to this the importance of precise timing of signaling events and attention to physiologically effective concentrations of factors that dictate growth, differentiation and apoptosis, it is evident that specific molecules are needed to assist in 'pacing' the developmental steps. In this first Commentary we highlight a number of reviews and studies that address the complex biology of cartilage and bone formation, a prime example of cell-cell interaction, communication through diffusible factors, and critical signaling pathways of cell behavior that are inimical to the development of the skeleton. While these processes require a variety of growth factors and hormones we bring attention to one member of the CCN family of genes [3], CCN2(CTGF), that plays a key role in building cartilage and bone tissues. The work stemming from the laboratory of Dr. Takigawa and colleagues [4-6] focuses on the role that CCN2 plays in bone formation and particularly in the vascularization events. CCN2 has multiple effects on a number of cell types promoting chemotaxis, migration, adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and /or extracellular matrix formation. CCN2 is maximally expressed in hypertrophic chondrocytes prior to the initiation of osteogenesis and angiogenesis. CCN2 shares homology with other members of the CCN family noted for their molecular organization into basically four structural domains: an IGFBP module, a von Willebrand type C repeat, a thrombospondin type 1 repeat and a C-terminal module; these modules are involved in protein-protein interactions and associations with components of the extracellular matrix. The definitive functions of these modules has still to be worked out, but their homology to the larger parent molecules suggest possibilities for multiple protein partners and intricate modulatory functions. CCN family proteins, and their isoforms, are distributed intracellularly as well as extracellularly [3]. In other words, nature appears to have imbued CCN2 and likely the other CCN proteins with structural features that could integrate them into intracellular as well as extracellular molecular machines. The challenge will be to understand the full complexity of their activities, biological functions, and clinical relevance [3]. More recent studies by Safadi et al [7], Ivkovic et al [8], and Friedrichsen et al [9] place CCN2 squarely in the limelight as critical for cartilage and bone formation from earliest developmental stages to later fetal and post-natal stages of skeletal growth. In fact, CCN2 expression persists in vascular endothelium, condensed connective tissue around bone and cartilage, and maturing layer VII neurons in the cerebral cortex. CCN2 knockout mice exhibit skeletal dysmorphisms as a result of impaired chondrogenesis. Thus CCN2 appears not to be rescued by other CCN members. So, although many macromolecules figure prominently in formation of cartilage and bone, specific CCN proteins appear to be key players in mediating development of cartilage and bone from first conception.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,013
Communication savante0,0040,009
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,009
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,305
Écart entre enseignants0,291 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCell Communication and SignalingMême sujetConnective Tissue Growth Factor ResearchTravaux en français237 207