Low risk of recurrence of oculorespiratory syndrome following influenza revaccination.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: During the 2000-2001 influenza vaccination season, a new adverse event associated with the influenza vaccine, called oculorespiratory syndrome (ORS), was identified in Canada. We examined the risk of recurrence of ORS for individuals affected in 2000-2001 who were revaccinated in the community setting in 2001-2002. METHODS: We conducted a telephone survey in May 2002 in which participants were asked whether they had been revaccinated in the 2001-2002 immunization season and whether they had experienced any recurrence of ORS or any other adverse event. Eligible individuals (n = 609) included residents of British Columbia aged 18 years or more who had reported any type of adverse event associated with the influenza vaccine in 2000 and who had participated in a survey in September 2001 that characterized their adverse event experience. RESULTS: The response rate to this survey was 92% (561 of 609 people approached). Of the 561 participants, 202 were revaccinated in 2001. Among the 202 revaccinated, 122 individuals had previously reported ORS in 2000: 40 had described their ORS experience in 2000 as mild (present but not bothersome), 44 as moderate (interrupting daily activities), 35 as severe (preventing daily activities) and 3 did not provide specific details. Six of the 122 individuals experienced a recurrence of ORS following revaccination. The estimated risk of recurrence for ORS following revaccination in the community setting was 5% (95% confidence interval 2.2%-10.5%). Four of the 6 individuals described their ORS recurrence in 2001 as milder than the ORS they had experienced in 2000. INTERPRETATION: We found a low risk of recurrence of ORS for individuals previously affected in 2000 when they were revaccinated in 2001, including those whose ORS in 2000 had prevented daily activities but was not clinically severe. Health care providers should be confident in the safety of recommending revaccination of these individuals. As with all vaccines, however, a detailed risk-benefit assessment should be undertaken before revaccination of people whose previous adverse event experience may have included collapse, respiratory difficulty (including throat tightness) and/or chest discomfort requiring emergency intervention.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».