Special issue featuring articles from the 3rd International Symposium on Advanced Biomaterials and Biomechanics
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I felt very privileged when I was invited to put together this special issue of Biomedical Materials: Materials for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine , dedicated to advanced biomaterials. This topic was the subject of the 3rd International Symposium on Advanced Biomaterials and Biomechanics (ISAB 2 2005) held in Montreal on 3–6 April 2005. ISAB 2 2005 mainly focused on emerging biomaterials as well as recent developments in biomechanics, including their applications in the development of medical devices. As everybody knows, the field of biomedical materials and medical devices is a dynamic and a rapidly expanding discipline that addresses the fundamental and the engineering aspects of materials used in biology and medicine. The growing field of applications of biomedical materials ranges from the replacement of body parts and tissue engineering to drug delivery and gene therapy. In the post-genomic era, the potential for both regenerative medicine and nanomedicine is immense and they have become two of the most rapidly developing fields in biomedical research. A total of 228 papers (154 oral presentations and 74 poster presentations) were presented during the ISAB 2 symposium. We are very proud to say that we had several high profile representatives of the field (six keynote speakers and seven guest speakers). To accommodate all accepted papers, the scientific program was organized into 30 sessions covering most of the aspects of advanced biomaterials/biomechanics. The topics presented a range from bio/nanomaterials, smart materials/devices, bioceramics and bioglasses, sterilisation of medical devices, cell encapsulation, nanotubes, porous biomaterials, artificial muscles, and tissue engineering. Also, recent advances in locomotion system analysis, biomechanical modeling, ligaments and joint evaluation, spinal biomechanics and fluid biomechanics were discussed. The symposium was very successful and was highly appreciated by the attendees and participants. It is particularly delightful to know that distinguished researchers have contributed their excellent papers to make a special issue on biomedical materials. We would like to express our thanks to all the authors for submitting their work to this special issue. We also acknowledge the contributions of the referees who participated in the review process. The encouragement and assistance of Professors F-Z Cui, I-S Lee and M Spector, Editors-in-Chief of Biomedical Materials , as well as the discussions we had, are greatly appreciated. We hope that researchers in the field of biomedical materials will find the papers in this special issue useful.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,105 | 0,045 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».