MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2126604070 · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2013.07.038

Non-invasive diagnosis of small nodules in cirrhosis

2013· letter· en· W2126604070 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tetsuji Fujita

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Hepatology · 2013
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCirrhosisHepatocellular carcinomaIntrahepatic CholangiocarcinomaHepatologyRadiologyContrast enhancementInternal medicineMagnetic resonance imaging

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Contrast enhanced CT-scan to diagnose intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients with cirrhosisJournal of HepatologyVol. 58Issue 6PreviewContrast enhanced computed tomography (CT-scan) is a standard of care for the radiological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. This technique, however, is not validated to exclude intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) which may develop in patients with cirrhosis, as well. Full-Text PDF Reply to: “Non-invasive diagnosis of small nodules in cirrhosis”Journal of HepatologyVol. 59Issue 6PreviewWe appreciate Dr. Fujita comments on our study on the diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced CT-scan to evaluate the dynamic vascular enhancement pattern of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in cirrhotic patients [1]. One comment is that lack of the radiological hallmark of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, wash-in followed by wash-out) does not preclude the diagnosis of an HCC with an atypical vascular behavior and that the typical hallmark is less often found in small and well differentiated tumors. Full-Text PDF Open Access In the recent issue of the Journal of Hepatology, Iavarone and colleagues [[1]Iavarone M. Piscaglia F. Vavassori S. Galassi M. Sangiovanni A. Venerandi L. et al.Contrast enhancement CT-scan to diagnose intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.J Hepatol. 2013; 58: 1188-1193Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar] report the dynamic vascular enhancement pattern of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) on helical CT in patients with cirrhosis. The authors conclude that contrast enhanced CT-scan may be able to be used as a sole imaging technique for non-invasive diagnosis of nodules developing in cirrhosis irrespective of nodule size, because the radiological hallmark of early homogenous enhancement in the arterial phase and wash-out in the delayed phase in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was not observed in any of the ICCs. The absence of contrast wash-out in delayed phases in ICCs has been shown also in a study using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for 25 patients with cirrhosis [[2]Rimola J. Forner A. Reig M. Vilana R. de Lope C.R. Ayuso C. et al.Cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis: absence of contrast washout in delayed phases by magnetic resonance imaging avoids misdiagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.Hepatology. 2008; 50: 791-798Crossref Scopus (217) Google Scholar]. These findings do not mean that a nodule not having the radiological hallmark of HCC is not HCC. In a prospective study that evaluated small nodules (1–3 cm) in cirrhosis, using enhanced helical CT-scan and contrast enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in accordance with the 2001 European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines, among 72 nodules, 14 were hypovascular on both CT-scan and CEUS, which were all less than 2 cm in diameter, and 5 of which proved to be HCC by biopsy [[3]Bolondi L. Gaiani S. Celli N. Golfieri R. Francesco Grigioni W. Leoni S. et al.Characteristics of small nodules in cirrhosis by assessment of vascularity: the problem of hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma.Hepatology. 2005; 42: 27-34Crossref PubMed Scopus (362) Google Scholar]. Of 63 well-differentiated HCCs with a mean size of 1.57 cm, only 8 (13%) had the radiological hallmark of HCC on multi-detector CT [[4]Yoon S.H. Lee J.M. So Y.H. Hong S.H. Kim S.J. Han J.K. et al.Multiphasic MDCT enhancement pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma smaller than 3 cm in diameter: tumor size and cellular differentiation.Am J Roentogenol. 2009; 193: W482-W489Crossref PubMed Scopus (98) Google Scholar]. Thus, the radiological hallmark of large HCCs is not necessarily that of small HCCs. In the study by Iavarone and colleagues, tumor size did not significantly affect CT-scan appearance of ICC, which is not in keeping with a previous study, where for tumors smaller than 3 cm in diameter, there was no significant difference between the enhancement pattern of ICC and that of HCC [[5]Kim S.J. Lee J.M. Han J.K. Kim K.H. Lee J.Y. Choi B.I. Peripheral mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhotic liver.Am J Roentogenol. 2007; 189: 1428-1434Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar]. The discrepancy between the studies might be attributable to the different characteristics of ICCs registered and/or different techniques for contrast enhanced CT-scan. It should be noted that smaller nodules have lesser risk of malignancy, leading to the recommendation of follow-up of a nodule smaller than 1 cm in the guidelines. Following the publication of a study showing that early enhancement in the arterial phase followed by wash-out in the delayed phase on CEUS did not discriminate between HCC and ICC [[6]Vilana R. Forner A. Bianchi L. Garcia-Criado A. Rimola J. Rodriguez de Lope C. et al.Intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis patients may display a vascular pattern similar to hepatocellular carcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasound.Hepatology. 2010; 51: 2020-2029Crossref PubMed Scopus (237) Google Scholar], the American Association for Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) updated the guidelines, in which one imaging technique (CT-scan or MRI) excluding CEUS is advocated for diagnosing even small liver nodules. Another reason for withdrawal of CEUS from the diagnostic algorithm in the AASLD guidelines is unavailability of specific contrast agents producing microbubbles for ultrasonography in the United States, but which are available in Europe, Canada, and Asia [[7]Tan C.H. Low S.C. Thng C.H. APASL and AASLD consensus guidelines on imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a review.Int J Hepatol. 2011; 2011: 519783Crossref PubMed Google Scholar]. In the updated EASL guidelines, two imaging techniques are recommended for diagnosing small liver nodules although one imaging technique is also acceptable, and the role of CEUS is controversial in non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in cirrhosis [[8]European Association for the Study of the Liver European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer EASL–EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma.J Hepatol. 2013; 56: 908-943Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (4508) Google Scholar]. In the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines, CEUS on its own is an accepted imaging modality for HCC diagnosis [[7]Tan C.H. Low S.C. Thng C.H. APASL and AASLD consensus guidelines on imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a review.Int J Hepatol. 2011; 2011: 519783Crossref PubMed Google Scholar]. The vascular enhancement pattern shown by contrast enhanced CT-scan appears to be dependent on tumor activity and the amount of interstitial space in the fibrous stroma of an individual ICC [[9]Chung Y.E. Kim M.J. Park Y.N. Choi J.Y. Pyo J.Y. Kim Y.C. et al.Varying appearances of cholangiocarcinoma: radiologic pathologic correlation.Radiographics. 2009; 29: 683-700Crossref PubMed Scopus (277) Google Scholar], implying varying appearances of ICC. In fact, in the study by Iavarone and colleagues [[1]Iavarone M. Piscaglia F. Vavassori S. Galassi M. Sangiovanni A. Venerandi L. et al.Contrast enhancement CT-scan to diagnose intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.J Hepatol. 2013; 58: 1188-1193Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar], variable vascular patterns of ICC in early and delayed phases were observed. Other than HCCs and ICCs, a variety of non-neoplastic, preneoplastic, and neoplastic lesions develop in the cirrhotic liver, such as focal fatty infiltration, arterioportal shunt, immature abscesses, macro-regenerative nodules, hepatic tuberculosis, focal nodular hyperplasia, dysplastic nodules, hemangiomas, and metastatic nodules from other sites [9Chung Y.E. Kim M.J. Park Y.N. Choi J.Y. Pyo J.Y. Kim Y.C. et al.Varying appearances of cholangiocarcinoma: radiologic pathologic correlation.Radiographics. 2009; 29: 683-700Crossref PubMed Scopus (277) Google Scholar, 10Dietrich C.F. Liver tumor characterization – comments and illustrations regarding guidelines.Ultraschall Med. 2012; 33: S22-S30Crossref PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar]. HCC and ICC with atypical imaging features are likely difficult to be distinguished from such lesions by the dynamic vascular enhancement pattern on CT-scan alone. Using Kupffer cell-specific and/or hepatocyte-specific contrast agents, additional CEUS or MRI may be warranted for non-invasive diagnosis of small nodules in cirrhosis. The author declared that he does not have anything to disclose regarding funding or conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,013

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,259
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of HepatologyMême sujetCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer StudiesTravaux en français237 207