Design of sparse annular arrays for high-frequency imaging
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The design of a 35 MHz sparse annular array is described. The array was designed to provide < 125 µm resolution over an 8 mm imaging depth, while suppressing the secondary lobes to more than 60 dB below the main beam. The array has 10 equal- area elements and a 5 mm outer diameter. The array was designed with 110 µm equal-width kerfs, resulting in only a 50% active aperture. The simulated performance of the array was compared to a 5 mm diameter, 10-element array operating with a 100% active aperture. The -6 dB beamwidths of the sparse and full arrays were found to increase smoothly from 61 microns at a depth of 6 mm to 125 microns at 14 mm. For the sparse array, secondary lobes were suppressed by more than 60 dB over the entire 8 mm region, whereas the fully active array produced secondary lobes that were suppressed to -60 dB lobes only at depths greater than 10 mm. Obtaining better lateral resolution is always desirable in ultrasound imaging. The lateral resolution of an ultrasound imaging system is inversely proportional to the aperture of the transducer. For a linear/phased array, there is a linear relationship between the aperture and number of array elements. If the number of elements is doubled, the image resolution will improve by a factor of two. For an annular array, the aperture is proportional to the square-root of the number of elements. Therefore, four times the number of elements are required for a two times improvement in lateral resolution. Unfortunately, if the aperture is increased by simply enlarging the area of the array elements, higher secondary lobes will result. We have developed an annular array design that allows for a significant improvement in lateral resolution, without a corresponding increase in the number of elements or level of secondary lobes. Instead of expanding the aperture by increasing the area of the array elements, the space between the elements is enlarged. The resulting sparse array provides improved resolution and since the amplitude of secondary lobes is primarily determined by the area of the elements, an increase in the level of secondary lobes is avoided. II. THEORY The transient radiation pattern of an annular array can be calculated very efficiently using the impulse response method (1). The pressure p(r,t) produced by an ultrasound transducer at a location r can be calculated from: p(r,t) = pulse(t) * h(r,t) (1) The function pulse(t) contains information about the electromechanical response of the transducer. For most calculations it is adequate to define pulse(t) using a simple analytical expression chosen to reflect the shape and bandwidth of the anticipated experimental pulse. In the calculations performed throughout paper, pulse(t) is defined using a Gaussian modulated sinusoid with 50% bandwidth. The second function h(r,t) is called the spatial impulse response of the transducer. The spatial impulse response contains all the amplitude and phase information associated with the geometry of the array. In order to calculate the spatial impulse response for an annular array with transmit focusing, the impulse responses from individual annuli are delayed by the appropriate transmit delays and then summed. Similarly, to model the effect of receive beamforming, the impulse responses from different annuli are delayed using the appropriate receive delays and summed. The two-way response is found by convolving the total transmit impulse response with the total receive impulse response, and then convolving the result with a function representing the two-way electromechanical response of the transducer. The convolution result is demodulated and the peak amplitude is plotted in dB relative to the central axis. If this is repeated for different target locations, a cross-section of the two-way radiation pattern can be created at a chosen depth. The aperture size, frequency, focal distance, number
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».