PENGARUH KUALITAS LAYANAN PENDIDIKAN TINGGI TERHADAP KEPUANSAN MAHASISWA (STUDI KASUS PADA UNIVERSITAS BAKRIE)

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui pengaruh kualitas layanan pendidikan tinggi terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa dengan mengadopsi metode HEdPERF. Data penelitian didapatkan dari 297 responden penelitian yang berstatus sebagai mahasiswa aktif Universitas Bakrie. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi linier berganda untuk mengetahui pengaruh antara variabel bebas dan terikat dan Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) untuk mengetahui indikator apa saja yang harus ditingkatkan dalam rangka untuk meningkatkan kepuasan mahasiswa Universitas Bakrie. Variabel bebas yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yakni non-academic aspects, academic aspect, reputations, access dan program issues dan variabel terikat yang digunakan adalah kepuasan mahasiswa ( student satisfaction ). Hasil analisis data menunjukkan secara bersamaan kelima variabel bebas tersebut berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa ( student satisfactions ) Universitas Bakrie dengan koefisien determinasi sebesar 57.6%. Sedangkan berdasarkan hasil IPA menunjukkan bahwa terdapat delapan butir indikator yang harus ditingkatkan untuk meningkatkan kepuasan mahasiswa ( student satisfaction ). Kata kunci : HEdPERF, kualitas layanan, Importance Performance Analysis , kepuasan mahasiswa This study was conducted to determine the effects of higher education service quality to student satisfaction by adopting HEdPERF method. The resources data obtained from 297 respondents status as active students in Bakrie University. The analytical methods used are multiple regressions analysis to determine the effects of dependent and independent variables and Importance Performance Analysis to determine which indicators should be improved to increase student satisfaction in Bakrie University. Independent variables used in this study are non-academic aspects, academic aspect, reputations, access, and program issues. While the dependent variable used is student satisfactions. The result of the data analysis showed simultaneously five independent variables significantly influence student satisfaction of Bakrie University with coefficient determinations is 57.6%. whereas according to IPA result showed that there are eight indicators that have to be improved to increase student satisfaction in Bakrie University. Keywords: HEdPERF, service quality, Importance Performance Analysis, student satisfaction DAFTAR PUSTAKA Bao, D.C.(2010). Service q uality, p ercieve p rice and c ustomer s atisfaction in h igher e ducation : A comparison between p ublic u niversity and n on p ublic u niversity in Vietnam . Ho Chi Min City, Vietnam: University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City. Benerson, M. L., Levine D.M., & Krehbiel, T.C.(2012). Basic business statistic: Concepts and applications (12th ed.) England: Pearson Education. Brochado, A.(2009). Comparing alternative instruments to measure service quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education. Vol.17, No.2, 174-190 Erlinna.(2014). Perbandingan pengaruh penerapan service quality dan penetapan harga rendah terhadap kepuasan pelanggan pada dua maskapai low-cost di Indonesia (PT Lion Mentari Airlaines dan PT Airasia. Universitas Bakrie, Jakarta. Firdaus, A. (2005). The Development of HEdPERF: A New Measuring Instrument of Service Quality for The Higher Education Sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 569-581 …. (2006). Measuring service quality in higher education: HEDPERF versus SERVERF. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. Vol.24, No.1, 31-47 Foster, S.T.(2007). Managing quality: Integrating the supply chain (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education. Goetsch, D.L., & Davis S.B.(2010). Quality management for organizational excellence: Introduction to total quality (6th ed.).New Jersey: Pearson Education. Gruber, T., et al.(2010). Examining student satisfaction with higher education services: using a new measurement tool. International Journal of Public Sector Management , Vol.23, No.2, 105 - 123 Kayastha, A. (2011). A study of graduate student satisfaction towards service quality of universities  in Thailand. Cha-am,Thailand: Webster University. Kotler, P., & Keller, K.L.(2012). Marketing management (14 th ed.). USA: Pearson Education. Kumar, J., & Yang, C.L.(2014). Service quality and loyalty of international students studying in field of hospitality and tourism. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, Vol.2, No.3, 97 - 118 Lovelock, C., & Wirtz, J.(2011). Service Marketing: People, technology, strategy (7th ed.). New Jersey: Person Education. Madihah, A.(2012). Analisis kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap kualitas pelayanan pendidika (studi kasus program studi pascasarjana kajian administrasi rumah sakit fakuktas kesehatan masyarakat universitas Indonesia) . Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor. Malhotra, N.K.(2012). Basic Marketing research: Integration of social media (4th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education. Parasuraman, A., Zeithml, V.A., & Berry, L.L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implication for Future Research. The Journal of Marketing.Vol.49, no.4, 41-50 ….(1988). SERVQUAL : A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perception of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing. Vol.64, no.1 , 12-40 Putri, N. Amanda. (2012). Analisis Pengaruh Biaya Pendidikan, Lingkungan Kampus, dan Proses Pembelajaran terhadap Motivasi Berprestasi Mahasiswa Universitas Bakrie . Universitas Bakrie, Jakarta. Qi, Huang,(2009). The relationship between service quality and student satisfaction in higher education sector: A case study on the undergraduate sector of Xiament University of China . Thailand: Assumption University. Ramadhan, E.W., Setyanto, N.W., & Efranto, R.Y.(2013). Analisis kepuasan konsumen terhadap kualitas pelayanan dengan penerapan importance performance analysis (IPA) dan model kano (Studi kasus pada asrama mahasiswa griya universitas brawijaya malang). Jurnal Rekayasa dan Manajemen Sistem Industri. Vol.1, no.2 , 183-193 Republik Indonesia.(2003). Undang-undang sistem pendidikan nasional . Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara. Republik Indonesia.(2012). Undang-undang pendidikan tinggi . Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara. Sekaran,U. (2003). Metode penelitian untuk bisnis (Kwon Men Yon, Penerjemah). Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Sekaran, U., &  Bougie, R.(2013). Research methods for business (6th ed.).West Sussex, US: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Shauchenka, H., & Buslowska, E.(2010). Methods and tools for higer education service quality assessment (survey). Zesyty Naukowe Politechniki Bialostockiej. Informatyka. Vol 3, 87-102 Sistem Pendidikan Tinggi. (2014), Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi, http://dikti.go.id/profil-dikti/sistem-pendidikan-tinggi/ , diakses pada 20 Februari 2014 Teas, R.K. (1993). Expectations, performance evaluation, and consumers’ perception of quality. Jurnal of Marketing. Vol 57 , 18-34 Visi dan Misi Universitas Bakrie . (2014), Universitas Bakrie, http://www.bakrie.ac.id/en/tentang-ub/profile-ub/visi-misi-ub , diakses pada 23 Februari 2014 Wibisono, Y.Y., Nainggolan.(2009). Validasi HEdPERF dan penerapannya pada pengukuran mutu layanan di teknik industri unpar . Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, Bandung. World Economic Forum.(2012). The Global Competitive Report 2012-2013: Full Data Edition , Geneva, US: Author World Economic Forum.(2013). The Global Competitive Report 2013-2014: Full Data Edition , Geneva, US: Author Zikmund, W.G., Babin, B.J., Carr, J.C., & Griffin, M.(2010). Business research methods. (8th ed.). Canada: South-Western, Cengage Learning.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.