Our Jewish Brethren: Christian Responses to Kristallnacht in Canadian Mass Media
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The discussion of Canadian responses to Holocaust has unfolded largely in response to work of Irving Abella and Harold Troper. In their study, None Is Too Many. Canada and Jews of Europe, 1933-1948, they argued that although some organizations and high-placed members of religious groups, such as Anglican and United Churches, actively campaigned on behalf of Jewish refugees, most Canadians seemed indifferent to suffering of German Jews and hostile to their admission to Canada. (1) Their book takes its title from now famous response of leading Canadian immigration official in 1945 to question of how many Jewish refugees Canada should take in. Despite Abella and Troper's recognition that there were a handful of concerned, dedicated citizens scattered across Canada, they did not analyze Christian responses to Holocaust in great detail, concluding that the churches remained silent, allowing Canadian federal government to dismiss few voices of Christian protest that did exist. (2) It was this generalization of silence that caused Alan Davies and Marilyn F. Nefsky to survey Canadian Protestant denominational responses to Holocaust. They found mixture of anti-Nazi and, to lesser extent, pro-Jewish figures, but much ambivalence and apathy as well. No sustained universal outcry on behalf of beleaguered refugees ever erupted from either Christian or Protestant rank and file, they argued. Neither Christian nor Protestant Canada spoke with collective voice, (3) and few churches understood true dimensions of evil. (4) Indeed, Canadian Christian community was hindered by an inherent negativity towards Jews and Judaism that embedded itself in classical Christian theology. (5) Other scholars of Canadian Jewish history, such as Gerald Tulchinsky, Haim Genizi, and Janine Stingel, have generally supported findings of Davies and Nefsky. (6) United States historians Robert Ross and William Nawyn arrived at roughly same conclusions when they surveyed U.S. Christian responses to Holocaust. For Ross, despite fact that Protestant press openly opposed Nazi Jewish policy after 1938, there occured another kind of 'silence' that was more disturbing in its consequences, 'silence' that followed lack of intervention on behalf of persecuted Jews and almost total failure of such interventions as were attempted. (7) Similarly, Nawyn concluded that rhetoric predominated over action among U.S. Protestants. (8) Despite their general pessimism, these Canadian and U.S. historians acknowledge that brutality of Kristallnacht pogrom of November 9-10, 1938, aroused widespread outrage against Nazism and some measure of sympathy for Jews. (9) Their brief descriptions of rallies and radio broadcasts suggested that at least some Christians had spoken out for Jews. This sparked our interest to examine more closely post-Kristallnacht reactions in Canada--not least because we also regard Nazi pogrom of November, 1938, as one of significant milestones on road to Auschwitz. (10) We view it as watershed--an event after which no reasonable person in Germany or abroad could downplay ideological importance or political radicalism of National Socialists' Jewish policy. Indeed, Kristallnacht pogrom marks point of transition between escalating Antisemitism of German politics in 1930's and massive violence associated with Nazi wartime Holocaust. In our study of post-Kristallnacht reactions of Canadian Christians, we have sought to broaden scope of source material considered by Davies and Nefsky, who drew primarily upon denominational journals. To that end, we have undertaken survey of nine leading Canadian newspapers in November and December, 1938: The Halifax Herald, The Gazette (Montreal), Ottawa Citizen, The Globe and Mail Toronto Daily Star, Winnipeg Free Press, The Leader Post (Regina), The Calgary Herald, and The Vancouver Province. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle