MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2130075256 · doi:10.1086/429672

No Inherent Association between Minor Mutations in HIV Protease at Baseline and Selection of the L90M Mutation at the Time of the First Virological Failure

2005· letter· en· W2130075256 sur OpenAlexaff
Chanson J. Brumme, P. Richard Harrigan

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2005
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British ColumbiaSt. Paul's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyMutationProteaseVirologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)GeneticsGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor—Using data from the Italian Cohort Naive Antiretrovirals (I.C.O.N.A.), Perno et al. provide evidence for an association between the presence of minor mutations in the HIV protease at baseline and the presence of the primary resistance mutation L90M at the time of the first virological failure of a protease-inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral regimen [1]. In this analysis of 93 cohort subjects for whom baseline and posttherapy resistance genotype data were available, the presence of L90M at the time of virological failure was significantly associated with the presence of the minor mutations L101/V and/or M361 at baseline. Using data from the Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy [HAART] Observational Medical Evaluation and Research (HOMER) cohort of 1191 HIV infected, antiretroviral-naive individuals initiating their first triple-drug regimen in British Columbia, Canada [2, 3], we investigated this association. We identified 500 subjects who initiated PI-based HAART and for whom baseline resistance genotype data were available. Of these 500 subjects, 111 experienced virological failure (defined as a plasma virus load [pVL] ≥500 copies/ mL after an initial suppression of pVL to <500 copies/mL) at some point during the first 30 months of follow-up. For 98 (88.3%) of these 111 subjects, resistance genotype data were available for the samples collected at the time of the first virological failure. At baseline, 9 (9.2%) of these 98 subjects had the L101/V mutation, 22 (22.4%) had the M361 mutation, and 2 (2.0%) already had the L90M mutation—results that are comparable to those in the I.C.O.N.A. [1]. At the time of the first virological failure (a median of 74 weeks after initiation of HAART), no additional L90M mutations were observed in this group. One explanation for the lack of L90M mutations observed in the HOMER cohort may be that only 7.1% of these 98 subjects were prescribed hard-gel saquinavir (Invirase) [4, 5] as their initial regimen, compared with 50.5% of the subjects in the I.C.O.N.A. [1]. Resistance genotype data from a minimum of 30 months of follow-up were available for all subjects in the HOMER cohort. We therefore investigated the appearance of the L90M mutation in the larger group of 500 subjects who initiated PI-based HAART, to determine whether the appearance of the L90M mutation at any point during the 30 months following the initiation of PI-based HAART was associated with the presence of minor protease mutations at baseline. At baseline, 41 (8.2%) of the 500 subjects had the L101/ V mutation, 107 (21.4%) had the M36I mutation, and 3 (0.6%) had the L90M mutation. At some point during the course of follow-up, new L90M mutations were selected in 9 subjects. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify factors associated with the appearance of the L90M mutation in this population. In a univariate analysis, the presence of the M361 mutation (hazard ratio [HR], 4.6; P = .02), a higher pVL (HR, 5.6/log10, increment; P = .03), and an AIDS-defining illness at baseline (HR, 4.7; P = .02) were associated with earlier selection of the L90M mutation in this population. Initiation of HAART with an indinavir-based regimen (vs. HAART containing other PIs) was associated with a decreased risk of selection of the L90M mutation (HR, 0.07; P = .0008). However, in a multivariate analysis adjusting for protease mutations at baseline, pVL, AIDS-defining illness, and type of PI at time of initiation of HAART as first therapy, the presence of the L101/V and M361 mutations at baseline was not significantly associated with the time to development of the L90M mutation in this population. However, there was a trend toward this association that may not have reached significance because of the small number of new L90M resistance mutations observed (HR, 3.4 [95% confidence interval, 0.91–13.2]; P = .07). Indinavir-containing therapy remained associated with later development of the L90M mutation (HR, 0.09; P = .002). In summary, data from the HOMER cohort do not support an association between the appearance of the L90M mutation at the time of the first virological failure and the presence of either the L 101/V or the M36I mutation. However, analysis of additional follow-up data from the HOMER cohort suggests that the presence of the M36I mutation may be associated, in some individuals, with the eventual appearance of the L90M mutation. The potential association between minorprotease mutations at baseline and the eventual selection of the L90M mutation is intriguing and merits further investigation in additional cohorts of HIV-infected individuals initiating antiretroviral therapy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,022

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,013
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0110,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,223
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases→Même sujetHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment→Travaux en français237 207→