MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2130193891 · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12337

Anderson, W. and Mackay, I.R.Intolerant Bodies: A Short History of Autoimmunity. 2014. 264pp £16.50 (pbk) ISBN 978‐1421415338

2015· article· en· W2130193891 sur OpenAlexaff
Victoria Spofford

Notice bibliographique

RevueSociology of Health & Illness · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMedicine and Dermatology Studies History
Établissements canadiensCarleton University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychosocialAutoimmunitySystemic lupus erythematosusMedicineRheumatoid arthritisIdentity (music)PsychoanalysisMistakeSociologyGerontologyImmunologyPsychologyPsychiatryPhilosophyDiseaseAestheticsImmune systemLawPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Autoimmune disorders, while increasingly common, are notoriously misconstrued. Essentially occurring when the body's immune system attacks and destroys its own healthy tissues by mistake, health researchers often overlook the impacts of such a medical paradox beyond the physiological ones. In Intolerant Bodies: A Short History of Autoimmunity, Warwick Anderson, a leading biomedical historian, along with Ian R. Mackay, a renowned immunologist best known for his work on autoimmune diseases, have explored the intricate crux of clinical and social experiences of autoimmune diseases. The monograph provides a detailed account of the laboratory and social history of autoimmune disorders, paying particular attention to four well-known medical diagnoses: multiple sclerosis (MS), lupus, rheumatoid arthritis and type I diabetes. The book's unique contribution lies in its intricate look at the psychosocial and historical relevance of autoimmune pathogenesis in a way that can be read as empowering to patients. By focusing on four specific diseases, Intolerant Bodies gives nuance to the daily lived experiences of patients living with these illnesses. This draws attention to the fact that living with MS, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis or type I diabetes is much more complex and debilitating than one might expect based on the widespread and oft-invisible nature of these chronic illnesses. Of particular interest to the medical sociology community are chapters 4 through 6, which deal with the self and otherness, and the reframing of identity when living with a paradoxical diagnosis which is ultimately centred around the body turning on itself. Animated with the warfare metaphors that have become characteristic analytical tools of medical sociological inquiry, the authors managed to write an original, clear, and thoughtful monograph that simultaneously informs and provokes thought. The detailed empirical context provided by Intolerant Bodies is supplemented with several brief excerpts from classical literature, including the works of Edgar Allen Poe and Charles Dickens, providing a rich historical and cultural frame of reference for the reader. In addition, Anderson and Mackay provide numerous examples of individuals who have struggled with autoimmune disorders throughout recent history, including several of Mackay's own patients, many of whom have had to grapple with ambiguous diagnoses and treatments as this new concept of pathogenesis became accepted. The one word of caution I have for readers is that this book is quite ambitious in including such a nuanced history of the subject matter. While fascinating, the authors included a considerable amount of detail in a very short monograph, and this could be construed by some as a shortcoming because despite being concise, the narrative is inevitably riddled with complexity. While the purpose of the monograph – as claimed explicitly in the book's title – is to be a short history of autoimmunity, the quick pace of the book, along with its comprehensiveness, made some chapters a bit more monotonous than others. While it was certainly no insurmountable feat to include such an immense amount of history in such a short monograph (and there is undoubtedly a great deal of detail that was excluded for this very reason), at times the writing felt a bit rushed, and in my opinion, the authors could still have accomplished a succinct yet detailed history had they written a more lengthy book.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,465
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,005
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,062
Tête enseignante GPT0,324
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSociology of Health & IllnessMême sujetMedicine and Dermatology Studies HistoryTravaux en français237 207