MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2131059306 · doi:10.1590/s1020-49892001000100002

New directions for the Revista/Journal

2001· article· en· W2131059306 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
María Luisa Clark

Notice bibliographique

RevueRevista Panamericana de Salud Pública · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueHealth and Medical Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLibrary scienceComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Those of you who have read the most recent issues of the Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública/Pan American Journal of Public Health will have noted an unprecedented event in the history of this publication: the creation of a new Editorial Board.Composed of ten renowned public health professionals and researchers from all the subregions of the Western Hemisphere, this advisory group assembled for the first time in Washington, D.C., on 5 and 6 October 2000 and met with the Revista/Journal staff and with high-level officials of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO).The wealth of the contributions and the productivity of the discussions in that initial meeting met our highest expectations.In fact, deliberations on the journal had scarcely begun when it became clear that there was a need to first address a fundamental question: What is the Revista/Journal?In its direction and content, is it independent of the Organization to which it belongs, or is it primarily an institutional journal, intended to disseminate PAHO's policies and to convey scientific information filtered through the "lenses" of the Organization?But in the end the feeling was unanimous: the Revista/Journal cannot and should not be just one of those things or the other.Because of its special position between those two extremes, the Revista/Journal is unique and is able to provide readers something that no other public health journal from the Americas can.The Revista/Journal is, on the one hand, a forum for the dissemination of the work of independent researchers, whose papers it subjects to rigorous peer review.On the other hand, its links with PAHO enable the Revista/Journal to offer its readers a select and balanced repertory of national experiences that can serve as models and sources of inspiration to other countries struggling to address their health problems and to improve their health systems and services.It is worth recalling that globalization has increasingly brought public health under the domain of a growing number of entities-the State, the corporate sector, the insurance industry, unilateral and bilateral organizations, research centers, the education sector, and organized civil society.In its role as an international organization that advises countries and offers technical assistance throughout the Region, PAHO's leadership position enables it to follow the pace at which our entire Hemisphere and each of its countries is advancing in health.This double identity as an autonomous publication and one that functions from a broad institutional perspective enriches the Revista/Journal and makes for its uniqueness.In this new millennium, we face the urgent need to adapt the Revista/ Journal to the demands of a new epidemiologic, social, economic, and political scenario and of technical and scientific advances that are coming at a dizzying pace.We staff members of the Revista/Journal recognize the publication's diverse audience: public health professionals, researchers, general and specialized health practitioners, health services administrators, social scientists, nursing personnel, university professors, medical students, and a wide range of health technicians, all scattered throughout the vast territory of the Americas, from the Canadian tundra to the southern tip of South America.No single publication can fully cover the thematic range that such diversity demands.An enormous variety of specialty journals exist for this purpose.Instead, the editorial staff focuses on enhancing and strengthening those features of the Revista/Journal that make it a distinctive publication, unique among others of its kind.In our conviction that statistics are of little value unless they serve as the springboard for moving forward from theory to practice, we seek to limit the publication of descriptive articles that provide local epidemiologic data, and to favor articles on interventions that appropriate evaluation methods have shown to be effective, or that describe new techniques and cast a new light on particular issues.We will also seek to include more pieces on the study and evaluation of health systems and services, from a qualitative, administrative, and economic point of view.In short, from now on the Revista/Journal will prioritize materials that, by their nature and subject matter, bear a direct or indirect influence on decision-making and the formulation of health policies.And with a view to providing our readers with research findings that are usable, one of our immediate goals will be to publish more

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,395
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,074
Tête enseignante GPT0,473
Écart entre enseignants0,400 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRevista Panamericana de Salud PúblicaMême sujetHealth and Medical EducationTravaux en français237 207