MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2131296889 · doi:10.1080/14623528.2010.483057

Worse Than War: Genocide, Eliminationism, and the Ongoing Assault on Humanity

2010· article· en· W2131296889 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Genocide Research · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGlobal Peace and Security Dynamics
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGenocidePoliticsCrimes against humanityTerrorismIslamThe HolocaustLawNazismSociologyCriminologyState (computer science)Order (exchange)Religious studiesIdeologyPolitical scienceWar crimeTheologyPhilosophyInternational law

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust (New York: Random House, 1997). See Robert R. Shandley, ed., Unwilling Germans? The Goldhagen Debate (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1998). Adam Jones, Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 2010). Goldhagen notes that ‘even if … the initial [Nazi killing] order [on the eastern front] was to kill ‘only’ teenage and adult Jewish males … the order was still genocidal and clearly was understood by the perpetrators as such … The killing of the adult males of a community is nothing less than the destruction of that community' (Hitler's Willing Executioners, p 153). Elements of the analysis can be questioned, however. How useful is it to describe the atrocities in Darfur as the product of a ‘Political Islamist exterminationist and eliminationist onslaught’ (p 539) by ‘the Political Islamic Sudanese government’ (p 539)? The Darfuri victims of the attack are themselves nearly all Muslims—something Goldhagen does not mention—and according to most expert opinion I have consulted, the motives of the assault pertain much more to ideologies of state security and counterinsurgency than politicized religion. Also, is it ‘Political Islamic’ or ‘Political Islamist’? Here as elsewhere, Goldhagen's nomenclature has its erratic moments. (Who are the ‘non-Arabic people’ referred to on p 517? There are Arab people and Arabic-speaking people; there are no ‘Arabic people’ or ‘non-Arabic people.’) Notably as well, while emphasizing Israel's vulnerability to ‘Political Islamist’ attack, Goldhagen does not define that state's governing ideology as ‘Political Judaism,’ i.e. Zionism. Then again, he has little need to, since Zionist/Israeli crimes are essentially effaced from his analysis, alluded to in a single mildly-phrased sentence (p 16). Goldhagen refers on four occasions (pp 53, 127, 238, 253) to the Syrian Asad regime's destruction of the rebellious city of Hama in 1982, which killed up to 25,000 people. But Israel's comparably murderous assault against Lebanon, next door, in the same year—which included the Einsatzgruppen-style massacre of thousands of Palestinian refugees by Israel's Christian Maronite minions—is ignored. See, e.g., the review by John Gray in New Statesman, February 4, 2010, http://www.newstatesman.com/books/2010/02/genocide-goldhagen-mass. Nancy Scheper-Hughes, ‘The genocidal continuum: peace-time crimes,’ in Jeannette Mageo (ed.), Power and the Self (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp 29–47. See also my adaptation of Scheper-Hughes's framing: Adam Jones, ‘“When the rabbit's got the gun”: subaltern genocide and the genocidal continuum,’ in Nicholas A. Robins and Adam Jones (eds), Genocides by the Oppressed: Subaltern Genocide in Theory and Practice (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2009), pp 185–207. See Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (New York: The Viking Press, 1965); Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews, 3rd ed. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003 [1961]) and Perpetrators, Victims, Bystanders: The Jewish Catastrophe 1933-1945 (New York: Harper Perennial, 1992); Gitta Sereny, Into That Darkness: An Examination of Conscience (New York: Vintage Books, 1983 [1974]); Robert Jay Lifton, The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide (New York: Basic Books, 1986) and Roberty Jay Lifton and Eric Markusen, The Genocidal Mentality: Nazi Holocaust and Nuclear Threat (New York: Basic Books, 1990); Israel W. Charny, How Can We Commit the Unthinkable? Genocide: The Human Cancer (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1982); Ervin Staub, Roots of Evil: The Origins of Genocide and Other Group Violence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989). Susan Brownmiller, Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1975). See especially Chapters 3–4 on ‘War’ and ‘Riots, Pogroms and Revolutions,’ and Chapter 5's study of sexual violence against American Indian and African American women. See Robert Gellately, Backing Hitler: Consent and Coercion in Nazi Germay (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001); Eric A. Johnson, Nazi Terror: The Gestapo, Jews, and Ordinary Germans (New York: Basic Books, 2000) and Eric A. Johnson and Karl-Heinz Reuband, What We Knew: Terror, Mass Murder, and Everyday Life in Nazi Germany: An Oral History (New York: Perseus Books, 2005); David Bankier, The Germans and the Final Solution: Public Opinion under Nazism (New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 1996). Robert Gellately, personal communication, 16 December 2009. Eric Johnson, personal communication, 16 December 2009. David Bankier, personal communication, 17 December 2009.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,017
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,271
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0170,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,417
Écart entre enseignants0,368 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle