The empowerment of women and the population dynamics of climate change
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dear editor, We welcome the focus on climate change and population growth, raised by Stephenson et al.1 Particularly in the context of reproductive health we agree with the sentiment that rapid population growth jeopardizes both human development and the capacity of poor communities to adapt to climate change is generally well known. While Stephenson et al.1 have ably addressed several key issues related to climate change and human health, the potential for women as agents of change has been somewhat overlooked. Specifically while reproductive health is discussed as a means to combat rapid population growth, the significance of empowering women on a global level is omitted. Women can be effective agents of change when addressing global climate change adaptation strategies. To effectively address rapid population growth, a culturally sensitive model for women's reproductive health services and education is required. Evidence confirms that such services result in the empowerment of women, and fewer births.2 Additionally, ‘the lack of access to reproductive health services undermines achievement of most if not all of the Millennium Development Goals (MDG)'.3 However, reproductive health is still not readily employed as a climate change strategy despite reports indicating that the provision of reproductive health services is the most cost-effective climate change strategy.4 Therefore, the empowerment of women through the provision of reproductive health services acts as both a adaptation strategy, and a mitigation strategy, each of which are highlighted by Stephenson et al.1 to tackle the challenges of climate change. A important outcome of the June 2010 G8 meeting in Toronto, Canada was the Muskoka Declaration, which called for a renewed emphasis on maternal and reproductive health. The declaration explicitly states that progress towards maternal and reproductive health has been unacceptably slow. To that end, global leaders have pledged $5 billion USD to be delivered through the Muskoka initiative, to accelerate MDGs 4 and 5, which focus specifically on child and maternal health. Additionally, issues of climate change in developing countries are addressed with the G8 making a commitment to share national strategies and experiences. Although this new commitment provides an opportunity to accomplish the goals of healthy outcomes for the world population and for the planet, it is disappointing that reproductive health and climate change remain unlinked. In light of the declaration, we agree with Stephenson et al. assertions that ‘population dynamics have not been integrated systematically into climate change science' and that ‘the contribution of population growth … to mitigation and adaptation programmes needs urgent investigation.' The links between women's health, population outcomes and climate wellbeing have been established. The time has come to integrate the sexual and reproductive health community into the climate change agenda in order to actualize change that will benefit women, nations and the environment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,032 | 0,035 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».