What to do about Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain? A Perspective from Australia
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ISSN 1758-1869 10.2217/PMT.11.59 © 2011 Future Medicine Ltd Pain Manage. (2011) 1(6), 495–497 Many countries in the developed world are awash with opioid overuse, misuse and opioid-related deaths, which have paralleled the increasing medical use of opioids for chronic noncancer pain [1]. This is despite growing concern over the efficacy of these drugs in long-term management. To attempt to reduce the harm associated with opioids but to ensure the continued availability for patient benefit, multiple attempts to develop guidelines, improve regulation and training have recently been attempted or are in progress [2,101,102]. However, unlike other disease areas where the issues are purely medical and hence in principle addressable by guidelines, the issues around appropriate opioid use and misuse go beyond the strictly medical and include the psychological, sociological, legal and regulatory. Hence strategies extending beyond guideline development are likely to be necessary. Given these multiple overlapping areas, it is likely that any solution will not be directly translatable into another healthcare environment although some individual points may be common across jurisdictions. In Australia, our healthcare environment has many similarities with those in western Europe and in Canada being largely based on the public sector with universal insurance and medication reimbursement to some degree. However there are some initiatives and systems unique to Australia, which may put us in a stronger position to find the right balance and methods to achieve Quality Use of Medicines for this difficult class of treatments. Australia is unique in having a National Medicines Policy [103]. This was initially launched in 1999 with the objective to improve positive health outcomes for all Australians through their access to and wise use of medicines. The chair of the eightmember committee, which is responsible for policy development, sits on an executive group which reports directly to the Federal Health Minister. This gives a remarkably short path for an advisory group to access the highest levels of government so that policy recommendations can be actioned. The National Medicines Policy is currently developing a policy on opioid use for chronic noncancer pain. It is reasonable to anticipate that recommendations made will be translated into action. The second unique structural component to our healthcare system is NPS, formerly known as the National Prescribing
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle