Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The traditional historical meta-narratives around leisure have focused on one Greek concept, ΣXOΛH, translated as schole and connected to the Latin (licentia) and English words. Direct lines were drawn from an interpretation of this Greek word in particular contexts to the current privileged leisure ideal first in Europe and the United Kingdom and then in North America. The complex history of the ancient Mediterranean world and the continuing histories of "leisures" in Europe and the United Kingdom not to mention other parts of the world were left invisible. As a performance of scholarship in leisure, we use a jazz, rap, and hip hop musical metaphorical strategy and draw upon scholarship from other disciplines to sound out the partiality of the historical meta-narrative of leisure and its resultant effects within current leisure scholarship and practices. Furthermore, we add historiographically to a redescription of the histories of leisure and imaginatively contribute to remixes of theories about leisures. Keywords: We want to acknowledge our indebtedness to and dependence upon the scholarship of Barrett, Berliner, Dixson, Lashua, and J.Z. Smith. In addition, Dr. W. Braun from the University of Alberta has provided invaluable inspiration, guidance, and productive questioning. We are grateful for the excellent support and editing of the editors, Henderson and Bialeschki. Notes 1 CitationWittgenstein (1953) illustrated a polythetic approach through "game." He described a wide variety of activities in how people use the word but notes that no single feature is common to all games. He used the concept of resemblances among different types if no single feature is common to the examples. 2Exceptions to this generalization about histories of leisure include the works of CitationAuguet (1994), CitationBalsdon (2002), Cross (Citation1990, Citation1998), Hunnicutt (1990, Citation1996), CitationPotter and Mattingly (1999), and CitationToner (1995). The work of Cross and Hunnicutt is recent history (after 1500 C.E.) and the rest focused specifically on ancient Rome. 3The phrase "always already" derives from CitationGadamer (1977), CitationHeidegger (1996), and CitationDerrida (1981). The phrase contests the meta-narratives around origins and challenges genealogical frameworks. That is humans are always already interpreting the world according to the already existing opinions, standards, expectations, discourse, and categories. These can be upset and reorganized when new events confront them, but only when one encounters an upset or "surprise" that leads to fresh judgments (CitationFoshay, 1998). 4 CitationCahill (2003) and CitationPerrotet (2003) range in their use of primary sources. Therefore, they must be used cautiously, reflexively, and critically. However, their interpretations and playing with ideas across cultures and historical eras provides interesting, provocative, and productive insights and questions for the leisure scholar. 5The history of Judaism and its relationship with other religious practices is highly contested. In addition, the interrelationship of paganism, Judaism, and Christianity engenders heated scholarly debate and affects numerous topics (CitationAscough, 1998; CitationJ. Z. Smith, 2003). 6The philosophers are also associated with Athenian democracy as opposed to Sparta who was ruled by its gerousia, or a council of older men. The tension between philosophy, politics, and military conflicts between Sparta and Athens provides a broader panorama context for competing understandings of humans, nature, leisure, and the cosmos.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle