MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2133803825 · doi:10.1111/j.1741-4113.2007.00422.x

The Cultural Significance of Donne's Sermons

2007· article· en· W2133803825 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueLiterature Compass · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLatin American and Latino Studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Regina
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExhibitionPoliticsPsychologyCompassLiteratureHistoryArt historyArtLawCartographyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract This paper is part of a Literature Compass panel cluster arising from the The Texas A&M John Donne Collection: A Symposium and Exhibition . Comprising an introduction by Gary Stringer and three of the papers presented at the symposium, this cluster seeks to examine the current state of Donne Studies and aims to provide a snapshot of the field. The symposium was held April 6–7, 2006. The cluster is made up of the following articles: ‘Introduction: Three Papers from The Texas A&M John Donne Collection: A Symposium and Exhibition ,’ Gary A. Stringer, Literature Compass 4 (2007), 10.1111/j.1741‐4113.2007.00420.x. ‘Donne and Disbelief: The Early Prose,’ Ernest W. Sullivan, Literature Compass 4 (2007), 10.1111/j.1741‐4113.2007.00421.x. ‘The Cultural Significance of Donne's Sermons,’ Jeanne Shami, Literature Compass 4 (2007), 10.1111/j.1741‐4113.2007.00422.x. ‘T. R. O’Flahertie's Copy of Donne's Letters,’ Donald R. Dickson, Literature Compass 4 (2007), 10.1111/j.1741‐4113.2007.00423.x. Donne's sermons are a lens through which to understand his culture, not because he is representative but because he is unique. This is because his sermons reveal clearly the hotly contested matters of his day, and, paradoxically, because they are in no way typical, they articulate the crises on which they comment in their most complex forms and expose the fault lines of their religious and political contexts. Donne is so helpful in understanding his culture's anxieties because he brings all of these to the forefront, often engaging his hearers in a self‐conscious reflection on matters of interpretation. In him, we encounter a passionate intellect, prompted by the crises threatening religion and the state, to great efforts of moderation and negotiation between hard‐line extremes. His capacious imagination envisioned – and then modelled – ways of dealing with these crises, ways that resisted the pressure to radicalise, although his sermons bear all the marks of the stress of remaining whole. In his sermons, Donne developed a professional and personal identity that confronts in all its complexity the contentious temper of both the Renaissance and the post‐modern worlds. While other preachers were using the pulpit to deliver ‘position papers’, then, Donne the preacher, like the poet, saw its potential as a place of conversion. Through his emphasis on teaching the processes of moral decision‐making rather than enforcing blind obedience or dogma, Donne links the most private of arbiters – conscience – to the most public of media – the sermon. Among many contributors to this discourse, Donne's exercises in interpretation stand out for the inclusiveness of their reach, the accommodation of his rhetorical gestures and the imagination of their ability to renovate controversial words. His sermons present him as an ethical model of integrity and a force of cohesion in an institution – the English Church – that was fractured by religious debate and polemic. While many used sermons to preach extremist views, Donne opted instead to moderate the heated religious and political debates of his day, and to do so without sacrificing conscience or integrity.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,912
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,499

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,313
Écart entre enseignants0,297 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle