Magmatic Processes and Associated Timescales Leading to the January 1835 Eruption of Cosigüina Volcano, Nicaragua
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cosigüina volcano, in northwestern Nicaragua, erupted violently on 20–24 January 1835, producing pumice, scoria, ash fall deposits, and pyroclastic flows with a bulk tephra volume of ∼6 km3. New geochemical data are presented for bulk-rocks, matrix glasses, melt inclusions and minerals from the 1835 deposits and a pre-1835 basaltic andesite tephra, with the aim of shedding light on the magmatic processes and associated timescales that led to the eruption. Our results reveal that the 1835 eruption was fed by a compositionally and thermally zoned magma reservoir situated ∼4 km (PH2O ∼100 MPa) beneath the volcano. Small volumes of crystal-poor dacite (<10 wt % phenocrysts, 63·8–64·8 wt % SiO2, ∼950°C) and silicic andesite (<10 wt % phenocrysts, 62·2 wt % SiO2, 960–1010°C) were erupted first, followed by relatively crystal-rich andesite (15–30 wt % phenocrysts, 57·4–58·8 wt % SiO2, 960–1010°C), which accounts for ∼90% of the erupted magma. The pre-1835 basaltic andesite (∼20 wt % phenocrysts, 52·4 wt % SiO2, 1110–1170°C) represents a mafic end-member for Cosigüina. The major and trace element compositions of the bulk-rocks, melt inclusions and matrix glasses suggest that (1) the pre-1835 basaltic andesite is a plausible parent for the 1835 magmas, (2) the 1835 andesite bulk-rocks do not represent true melts, but instead mixtures of silicic andesite liquid and a component of accumulated crystals dominated by plagioclase, and (3) the silicic andesite and dacite formed from the andesite magma through liquid extraction followed by fractional crystallization. Observed bimodal to trimodal crystal populations are consistent with a multi-stage, polybaric differentiation process, with calcic plagioclase (An75–90, An90–95) and magnesian clinopyroxene (Mg# = 67–75), plus olivine and magnetite, forming from mafic andesite, basaltic andesite and basalt in the lower crust. The calcic plagioclase exhibits sieve textures, which may be the result of H2O-undersaturated decompression during magma ascent to the upper crust; An50–65 plagioclase lacking a sieve texture, orthopyroxene (Mg# = 61 and 63–72), clinopyroxene (Mg# = 67), magnetite and apatite crystallized from andesite to dacite liquids in the shallow magma reservoir. An75–90 plagioclase comprising entire phenocrysts or cores with An50–65 rims in the 1835 magmas is cognate from earlier stages of differentiation and shows evidence of extensive diffusion of Mg when compared with similar An75–95 crystals hosted in the pre-1835 basaltic andesite. Using plagioclase–melt Mg partitioning and modelling of the Mg diffusion process, we constrain the residence time of these crystals in the silicic liquids to more than 100 years and less than 2000 years, with detailed analysis of three crystals yielding ∼400 years. We propose that magma reservoir zonation occurred on timescales of 102–103 years at Cosigüina. The occurrence of H2O-rich fluid inclusions in all 1835 samples and volatile element systematics in melt inclusions imply that the magmas were saturated with a vapour phase (H2O, S, ± CO2) during much of their evolution in the upper crust. Accumulation of free gas at the top of the magma reservoir may have led to overpressurization of the system, triggering the eruption. Catastrophic release of this exsolved vapour and syn-eruptive devolatilization of the melt injected several teragrams of S into the atmosphere. Our data, coupled with independent evidence from ice cores and tree rings, indicate that the Cosigüina eruption had a sizeable atmospheric impact comparable with or larger than that of the 1991 Pinatubo eruption. Stratigraphic evidence shows that Cosigüina has produced >15 compositionally zoned explosive eruptions in the past, suggesting that similar future eruptions are likely. The products of the 1835 eruption of Cosigüina share many features with compositionally zoned eruptive sequences elsewhere, such as the climactic eruption of Mount Mazama, the ad 79 'Pompei' eruption of Vesuvius and the 1912 eruption of Novarupta–Katmai.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».