Lipomatosis and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: causation, association or coincidence?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sir, Lipomatosis is an extremely rare disorder [1]. Affected persons develop multiple symmetrical, diffuse deposits of fat in the subcutaneous tissue. The lipomata cause physical disfigurement, without tendency to malignancy [1]. Little is known about secondary co-morbidity, with no previous reports of associated renal disease. We describe three patients with lipomatosis who developed biopsy-proven focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). A 41-year-old man with lipomatosis since age 18 was incidentally found to have proteinuria (1.36 g/day). Blood pressure and lipid levels were normal. Serum creatinine was 132 mmol/l. Renal biopsy showed FSGS. Prednisone and ramipril led to mild proteinuria reduction. After 110 months, creatinine was 154 mmol/l and proteinuria was 1.92 g/day. Patient 2 developed proteinuria and anasarca at age 7. These rapidly resolved with prednisone and diuretics. There was no follow-up. Lipomatosis appeared at 25. Urinalysis and blood pressure at 32 were normal. Asymptomatic proteinuria (0.79 g/day) was again noted at 34. Blood pressure, kidney function and albumin remained normal. Renal biopsy showed FSGS. Enalapril led to modest proteinuria reduction. After 134 months, creatinine was 190 mmol/l with proteinuria of 0.79 g/day. The third patient also had undiagnosed childhood renal disease, with peripheral oedema and proteinuria. Symptoms and proteinuria were resolved with herbs. Lipomatosis became apparent at 20. Asymptomatic proteinuria (2.2 g/day) was again noted at 37. Blood pressure was 120/80, serum creatinine was 136 mmol/l and albumin was normal. Renal biopsy showed FSGS. There was minimal response to prednisone, but with subsequent ramipril, proteinuria fell to 0.53 g/day. After 86 months, creatinine had risen to 280 mmol/l with proteinuria of 2.94 g/day. The slow deterioration in all patients occurred despite ACE inhibitor therapy and optimal blood pressure and lipid control. FSGS is a common renal diagnosis, with non-specific histological findings. Of interest here is the unifying association with lipomatosis. FSGS can be primary or secondary. Clinical and biopsy features usually allow distinction. In our patients, the lack of symptoms, degree of proteinuria, electron microscopic findings and slow progression suggested secondary disease. In patient 1, we were unable to identify any coexisting disorders associated with secondary FSGS. The other two patients had undiagnosed childhood renal disease, which, despite apparent resolution with therapy, may have been predisposing. Regardless, the rarity of lipomatosis makes the chance of finding the same renal lesion in the three patients less likely. Further, the same renal lesion occurs in obesity, a condition also associated with adipocyte excess. The mechanism underlying this association remains unclear, but the effects of adipocyte-derived hormones on glomerular structure and function have been suggested, with leptin, TNF-α and angiotensin II being identified as potential mediators [2,3]. We suggest a possible link between adipocyte tumour cell hormone production and the development and/or progression of FSGS in our patients. Increased reporting of similar cases is needed to confirm this association. Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».