MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2134419224 · doi:10.1063/1.1506759

John Frank Allen

2002· article· en· W2134419224 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhysics Today · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPhysicistSuperfluidityPhysicsArt historyHistoryQuantum mechanics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

John Frank Allen, the most senior of low-temperature physicists, died on 22 April 2001 near St. Andrews, Scotland, from age-related complications. Jack, as he was commonly called, was a physicist of many accomplishments, but none more remarkable than his discovery of superfluidity and the fountain effect in helium-II, the phase of liquid helium-4 below 2.17 K. The importance of this discovery has received much recent attention in connection with the discovery of superfluidity and Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) in the condensates of dilute atomic alkali gases.Even as late as 1938, theoretical physicist Fritz London was quoted as saying, “In the course of time the degeneracy of the Bose–Einstein gas has got the reputation of having only an imaginary existence.” The articles by Jack and Don Misener of the University of Cambridge and Peter Kapitza of the Institute for Physical Problems (now the Kapitza Institute for Physical Problems) announcing superfluidity appeared on adjoining pages of Nature in 1938. The discovery of superfluidity (see Physics Today, Physics Today 0031-9228 48 7 1995 30 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881467. July 1995, page 30 ) induced a great step forward in London’s thinking. The first major post–World War II conference was organized in July 1946 by Jack and Lawrence Bragg of Cambridge. London gave the opening address, making a firm connection between superfluidity and BEC. Jack was born on 6 May 1908 in Winnipeg, Canada, where his father, Frank, was the first professor of physics in the University of Manitoba. Jack took his BA in physics in 1928 at the University of Manitoba and moved to the University of Toronto to do a doctorate in superconductivity under John McLennan. He earned his PhD in 1933.After a scientifically unrewarding two-year postdoc at Caltech, Jack wrote to Ernest Rutherford in Cambridge to see if he could work with Peter Kapitza, a Russian-born pioneer in low-temperature physics in the Royal Society Mond Laboratory. By the time Jack arrived in Cambridge in 1935, Kapitza had been permanently detained in Moscow by Josef Stalin, and Jack was on his own. His time in the Mond Laboratory was astonishingly productive: Not only did he discover superfluidity, but also the celebrated fountain effect. Jack told me that when he first demonstrated the fountain to the Royal Society, the novelist H. G. Wells crawled under the table to see if a hidden pump was producing the fountain. A great deal of early progress in superfluidity was due to the influence of major theoretical physicists. While Kapitza had Lev Landau to talk to about theory, Jack had Rudolph Peierls, Harry Jones, and Neville Mott—hardly lesser theoretical help!One little known accomplishment of Jack’s is his invention of a vacuum seal in 1947. Pump connections in those days consisted of a piece of bicycle tube tightened with twisted 16- or 18-gauge copper wire, or flat glass flanges sealed with liberal quantities of plasticine and oil. Leaks were frequent and disastrous. It occurred to Jack that two ideally smooth parallel plates separated by an ideally smooth circular ring of precisely circular cross section should constitute a perfect vacuum seal. A telephone call to a company in Newcastle in the UK that made neoprene seals of all shapes and sizes for the oil and chemical industry yielded rings that worked perfectly the first time. Thus O-rings were born.Jack always kicked himself for failing to appreciate Laszlo Tisza’s suggestion to him to look for “ondes de température” (temperature waves), now called second sound. Jack’s graduate student Ernest Ganz set out to measure the time a heat pulse took to traverse a capillary tube full of helium-II. The velocity turned out to be of order 100 meters per second, the same order of magnitude as second sound. Because pulses were also detected when only a film was present in the capillary, it is possible Jack was on track to find third sound as well. The war began a few months later and put a stop to basic research at Cambridge.During the war Jack did work on antiaircraft shells. The Board of Ordnance, which is believed to be the oldest committee in the world, oversaw this work. The board was formed in 1346 to improve English artillery after what was perhaps its first use in the field at the Battle of Crécy. Jack assured me the original members were still sitting.In 1947, Jack moved to the University of St. Andrews, taking with him a group of fine low-temperature physicists to build up the department there. Among his major accomplishments at St. Andrews was overseeing the design and construction of a new physics building with special amenities for conferences. He served in several administrative posts at the university. His own contributions to research declined there as he approached retirement and his attention turned to matters such as the history of Scottish physicists. Perhaps that change of emphasis has something to do with the startling omission of Jack’s name in the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Physics to Kapitza in 1978 for his “basic inventions and discoveries in the area of low-temperature physics.” Surely Jack made equally important and basic discoveries in this field.Jack’s life was so varied and colorful, it certainly deserves a full-scale biography. I hope that will happen: Jack kept good records on practically everything. John Frank Allen PPT|High resolution© 2002 American Institute of Physics.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,456
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle