Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IUBMB) began publication of IUBMB Life in July 1999. It was the successor to our 19-year-old journal, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology International, which published short research communications. The change to a new journal, with a new title, was meant to coincide with a change in policy. Henceforth IUBMB Life would publish not only research communications, but also critical reviews at the cutting-edge of advances in biochemistry and molecular biology, and hypotheses, as well as recurring feature articles, some of which have become regular, almost monthly, contributions, as well as opening a window on IUBMB and its workings, including a calendar of IUBMB sponsored events. In making this change we set new criteria for the research communications, namely that they should be “extremely novel, short but complete and of broad interest to experimental biologists in biochemistry, molecular biology, cell biology and molecular medicine. Original research articles must provide new biological insights that warrant rapid publication.” We were aware that by the strict application of these criteria we were unlikely, at least initially, to receive sufficient acceptable short communications to fill a monthly issue, but this was not a major concern because of the other new contents of the journal, notably the reviews, would together, we felt sure, make an appealing package to the readership we hoped to acquire. In the subsequent eight-and-a-half years, our goals have been met. We now have a very visible Impact Factor of 2.31 which increases with every year. In all this we are sustained by a simply splendid Board of Editors, who, in line with IUBMB policy, represent a truly international mix, and by dedicated expert editorial assistants to help our everyday editorial work. We have evolved along the way. We regularly feature special issues devoted to the themes of the IUBMB Congresses and Conferences, and we are succeeding in our aim to be the flagship journal of the Union. Our original publisher was Taylor and Francis, later to become part of the Informa Group. At all levels they have been quite splendid colleagues, working with us to ensure a publication of high quality and punctuality, and took us into the electronic age with Manuscript Central. But the time has come to say goodbye to them, parting with the utmost gratitude for their support during all these years. We have a new publisher as from January 2008, John Wiley and Sons Inc., who already publish our sister journal, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. That acquaintance has made us already familiar with our new colleagues and we are confident that with their cooperation and professionalism IUBMB Life is destined to continue on its upward trajectory, and take on a new lease of life.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,029 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,021 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,008 | 0,012 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,225 | 0,228 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».