Where Is Here Anymore?: A Personal Reflection on "Representing the Environment," Chapter 3 of The Environmental Imagination by Lawrence Buell
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Where Is Here Anymore?: A Personal Reflection on "Representing the Environment," Chapter 3 of The Environmental Imagination by Lawrence Buell Tim Wynne-Jones (bio) One bright October day eight-and-a-half years ago, according to the printout on the photograph, I went out into the woods behind my home with my wife's camera to find an alphabet. Reading The Environmental Imagination (1995), I found myself recalling that sojourn, and went in search of the day's bounty through boxes and boxes of photographs—the enormous clutter of one's pre-digital life. I couldn't recall whether I snapped all twenty-six characters. I could only find nine. Some of which, dressed in camouflage, tried to evade capture. Some of them needed my help. Within the nine photographs I was able to recover there were just barely enough letters to spell out an interesting question with regards to my own interface with the environment and this particular discussion (fig. 1, fig. 2, fig. 3). Why search for an alphabet in the woods? What purpose is served by imposing this Apollonian principle on Dionysian nature? Perhaps my question is a corollary to Buell's question: "Must literature always lead us away from the physical world, never back to it?" Admittedly, an alphabet is not literature, but in truth, I often go to the woods to find stories, if only in the sense that I find a kind of peace there that is conducive to wondering as I wander. On one occasion I found a beaver dam where there wasn't one before and in figuring out how to empty the impromptu lake which now separated half of my property from the other half, I ended up finding the opening to a story I was having trouble starting. This is how The Boy in the Burning House (2000) began. I live on seventy-six acres of land in eastern Ontario. Tellingly, I spoke of the "woods" behind my house, in my opening remarks, when in fact it is "bush." No local would speak of this hardscrabble land as woods. I [End Page 118] Click for larger view View full resolution Figure 1. "W" Click for larger view View full resolution Figure 2. "H" Click for larger view View full resolution Figure 3. "Y" [End Page 119] use the word in an entirely literary way. One doesn't go to the bush to find a story, at least I don't. Trees in sufficient abundance to hide any man-made artifice are always woods for me unless they stretch on forever in which case they become forest, like the boreal forest that surrounds the northern Ontario lake where we have a camp and spend some part of every summer. The same lake, more or less, to which Burl Crow tracked down the elusive and solitary composer Nathaniel Gow in my novel The Maestro (1995). And there again is this theme of the Apollonian versus the Dionysian. Cosmos brought to chaos. Our camp at Lake Pogomasing—an Ojibwa word meaning "lake of many narrows"—cannot be reached by road but only by floatplane or by a train called the Budd Car, which will drop you off wherever you wish. The two-kilometer walk from the train track through this primordial forest is along a rough but man-made trail that has been there for 10,000 years. I'll take you back to this place later in our talk. But for now, I want to wander about a little aimlessly in the much gentler woods. Woods, for me, are the Hundred-Acre preserve of Winnie the Pooh (1926); woods are the semi-mystical landscape with a river running through it of Grahame's The Wind in the Willows (1908); woods are something only wild-ish—something contained within a literary sensibility. I own bush-land, which I choose to call woods, unless, of course, I'm hiring a local man to cut some of it down. Woods, for me, are, I suppose, a translation of nature into story. This image might be mistaken for a mask, but it is in fact the ideogram for the word "Ma," meaning "place" (fig. 4). So...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».