MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W213576846

Out in the Cold: Surviving Graduate School as a Woman of Colour. (Reports/Rapports)

2001· article· en· W213576846 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Meera Sethi

Notice bibliographique

RevueResources for feminist research · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGender Diversity and Inequality
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSilenceThe artsRacismSociologyPoliticsAction (physics)Affirmative actionMedia studiesLawPsychologyGender studiesAestheticsPolitical scienceArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

[The following article is adapted from introductory remarks made on the occasion of the launch of York Stories: Women in Higher Education at York University, on September 29, 2000,] I have come to believe over and over again that what is most important to me must be spoken, made verbal and shared, even at the risk of having it bruised or misunderstood. That the speaking profits me, beyond any other effect. Audre Lorde (1) When I read these words of Audre Lorde's, I knew that I also wanted to transform my silence into language and action, and that school was one of the ways I was going to do this. That was two years ago. Today I am not so sure. Let me explain. Having excelled academically in my undergraduate years as a fine arts student, and anxious to develop a further critical understanding of the intersection between the arts and socio-political movements, I decided to enroll as a in an M.A. program in Interdisciplinary Studies. Before entering studies, what I had expected from the two-year degree was a relatively safe space within which I could, with dedication and hard work, pursue my academic interests and work my way towards making social change. What I had not expected was the overwhelming pressure to compete theoretically; the rigid institutional codes for learning; and the institutionalized racism, sexism and homophobia of the academy. What I had also not yet realized was that these pressures, codes and discriminations were not mine alone, but were in fact a constant reminder to all those who are marked by difference; that there is indeed a model and a model teaching faculty. My desire to enter higher education, particularly school was fuelled to a large extent by my desire to engage in an academic feminist, antiracist, anti-colonial movement which was linked in its aims with cultural workers and community workers in the city. This desire was intricately tied to my own process of identity formation where I was coming to realize the tremendous anger I felt about racism, sexism, heterosexism, classism and numerous other structural inequalities and the potential this anger held for change. Perhaps I had entered academia with a certain naive optimism in that I wanted to work for a cause that went beyond its interior halls. No one had warned me, however, that what I was stepping into was a game that would zap me of my confidence and strength and lead me to reevaluate my reasons for being there. Recently, I have been wondering if being a graduate student is really more about being a professional academic than being a student. One of my disillusions about school is the intense emphasis placed on presenting, publishing, and building a curriculum vitae. Judging by the vast number of conferences, the corresponding culture to participate in these conferences, and the constant rumours of the need to publish or perish, I am curious as to exactly which academics can devote their time to such endeavours. Looking critically at such a culture, I am led to believe that professionalization is really a code word used to maintain a particular hegemony of white male, middle-class scholarship. And it is not that any one of us can not or do not compete or are not concerned about the advancement of our education and our careers, but it is useful to ask, under what extra pressures do we do this? And if indeed professionalization is what we want? If conference participa tion and academic publishing are one of few measures of success, then where, I ask myself, is the time left to commit ourselves to important struggles outside of academia? And further, if what is valued within academia is professionalization, then how can there be value given to community participation and grassroots involvement? Could it be that to be an academic means we must remove ourselves from the exigencies of daily challenges? …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,023
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,611
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,986

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0230,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,375
Tête enseignante GPT0,448
Écart entre enseignants0,073 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResources for feminist researchMême sujetGender Diversity and InequalityTravaux en français237 207