MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2136948150 · doi:10.1017/s0265021502000765

Cardiothoracic anaesthesia and the European Journal of Anaesthesiology

2002· article· en· W2136948150 sur OpenAlexaff
R.O. Feneck

Notice bibliographique

RevueEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Établissements canadiensSt. Thomas Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineSpecialtyPleasureLibrary scienceFamily medicineNeurosciencePsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I take great pleasure in writing this Editorial announcing the affiliation of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiologists (EACTA) with the European Journal of Anaesthesiology. It is one of the first affiliations between a specialist society and the Journal and we have great hopes for its success. Readers should be aware that we hope that research output associated with cardiothoracic anaesthesia will be reflected in an increase in sub-specialty publications in the Journal, and we are fortunate that Dr Hans Tydén, past Scientific Secretary of the EACTA, who is already an Editor, will be giving his considerable experience and talent to the Editorial team in this particular area. The EACTA was founded in 1983 by a group of eminent cardiac anaesthesiologists, motivated by Professor Simon de Lange, who has recently retired from the University of Maastricht. Of the pressures that led to the formation of the EACTA, two were most significant: first, the lack of time dedicated to the sub-specialty at the major international general meetings, and second, the rather bizarre situation whereby European anaesthesiologists travelled to meetings in North America to discuss matters of common interest with their other European colleagues. Thus, the EACTA was born. The inaugural meeting was held in Cambridge, UK, in 1984 and meetings have been held annually since. Therefore, EACTA is not new, but the organization has recently undergone a number of changes to meet the needs of our members. Information on our association (including details on membership, educational courses, grants and fellowships) can be found on our website: http://www.eacta.org/ What are the challenges facing cardiac anaesthesia today? The training of future cardiac anaesthesiologists is of concern, not because current standards are inadequate, but because these young men and women need to be protected from numerous competing pressures. We are clear about the needs of training in cardiothoracic and vascular anaesthesia and are fortunate in having past and current officers of the association, who are experienced in both education and training matters, to provide advice. We believe that the main priority in this area is to protect the quality and comprehensive nature of training programmes in the sub-specialty and to foster the development of specific areas of interest, such as perioperative echocardiography. Nowadays, it is difficult to develop research programmes in many aspects of anaesthesia and perioperative care, and cardiothoracic anaesthesia is not sheltered from these pressures. The EACTA has a long and proud tradition of supporting research in the past by encouraging research presentations at its meetings and it is now providing funds for research and clinical fellowships to its members. Cardiac anaesthesia is a 'high tech' area, frequently associated with high costs. As clinicians, we can do little to contain these factors, but we can and do ensure that colleagues from weaker European economies can continue their own personal professional development in an affordable manner. This has always been, and will remain, one of EACTA's foremost commitments. Despite these and other challenges, the practice of cardiothoracic anaesthesia is immensely fulfilling and it is no surprise to me that colleagues involved in this work throughout Europe are among the most dynamic and enthusiastic anaesthesiologists to be found. We look forward to bringing those qualities to our new affiliation with the EJA; you will be hearing more from us! R. Feneck President, EACTA; Department of Anaesthetics; St Thomas' Hospital; London, UK

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,902
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,889

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEuropean Journal of AnaesthesiologyMême sujetCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesTravaux en français237 207