MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2138876937 · doi:10.5812/ircmj.13756

Concerns on the Growing Use of Lithium: The Pros and Cons

2013· article· en· W2138876937 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Soodabeh Saeidnia, Mohammad Abdollahı

Notice bibliographique

RevueIranian Red Crescent Medical Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueExtraction and Separation Processes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNuclear Physics
Mots-clésconsMedicineTraditional medicineLithium (medication)Internal medicineComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Greek word, lithos means stone that is the origin of a metal named “lithium” (Li), the 27 th most abundant, the lightest alkali, highly reactive and flammable metal within chemical elements. Li is never found freely in the nature due to high reactivity and easily found as a soluble ion in water, so that it is ordinary gained from brines and clays. But, Li is commercially obtained from a mixture of Li and potassium chlorides. The Li minerals with high commercial value are belonging to silicates, micas and phosphates. Lithium has low atomic mass and is observed rarely in the solar system than other chemical elements. In nuclear physics, Li-6 deuteride is employed as a fusion fuel in staged thermonuclear weapons (1, 2). Because Li is employed in the batteries with the greatest effect on metal depletion and occurring remarkable environmental and health impacts, here we aim to describe whether Li-based systems can release Li as a toxic metal into the nature resulting in accumulation inside plants, animals and finally human body and consequently any toxic effects. The Li ion based system is an advanced technology. Although managing the thermal production, and protecting the electrical and gases have been performed, environmental pollution of battery materials is still a concern (Figure 1). Figure 1. Advantages and Disadvantages of Various Electrochemical Systems Containing Lithium; Li Compounds are Applied in Both Negative and Positive Electrodes as Well as Electrolyte of Li ion Cells However, literature review gives estimation about toxicity to human (on the basis of per MegaJoule of capacity) as follows: Nickel-metal hydride and sodium-sulfur batteries< Li-ion batteries< nickel-cadmium batteries< lead-acid batteries. However, Li batteries has the lowest performance of greenhouse gases discharge, because up to 12.5 kg of CO2 equivalent discharged per one kg of Li batteries, while this performance is the best for sodium-sulfur and lead-acid batteries. Meanwhile, production of Li batteries wastes high energy. On the other side, battery disposal can cause adverse impacts on environmental and health safety on both human and wildlife especially where consumers get rid of batteries together with other trashes in the urban solid disposal materials (Figure 2) (3). Figure 2. Recycling and/or Releasing the Lithium in the Nature and Accumulation in Human Body to Cause Damages in Diverse Organs The Li requirement in human is assumed below 100 μg/day, even though it shows critically therapeutic activities such as stabilization of neuronal activities, neuro-protection and support of neuronal plasticity resulting in beneficial effects in mood-disorders therapy (4). Lithium salts are not considered very toxic except its hydrides, Li tetrahydroaluminate and Li tetrahydroborate. Taking together, Li is classified among the health, physiochemical and ecotoxicological hazards on the basis of the National Occupational Health and Safety Commission (NOHSC) approved criteria, of which Li itself, Li aluminium hydride, and Li methanolate are under the Danish list of dangerous compounds ( 5 , 6 ). Interestingly Li can even enter salivary glands where it causes kinds of adverse effects. A summary of possible toxicities of Li accumulation in human body are exhibited in Table 1. Table 1. A Summary of Lithium Toxicity Due to Accumulation in Human Body (6-12) The toxicity concern on Li batteries is more raised when this metal can be absorbed and accumulated by edible plants. As far as literature show, Li is able to take up by diverse plants; nevertheless it is not necessary for herbal growth and development. However it is reported that Li can stimulate the growth of some plants. The ordinary level of Li in plants is reported 0.2-30 ppm depending upon preferential uptake. Unfortunately, some edible and medicinal plants such as Cirsium arvense (trivial English name: Creeping Thistle) and Solanum dulcamera (trivial English name: bittersweet, bittersweet nightshade, nightshade or blue bindweed) are able to accumulate Li three to six times more than other plants. Carduus arvense (trivial English name: Canada or plume thistle) and Holoschoenus vulgaris (trivial English name: Roundhead Bulrush) may accumulate Li at levels between 99.6 to 226.4 mg/g. Li amount is reported from 0.01 ppm (on the basis of dried weight) in bananas to 55 ppm in oats. Interestingly, Li is almost toxic in Citrus plants (6). Although Li is not considered as necessary element neither in animals nor in humans, it can be incorporated in the food chain from soils via flora to human. Minimizing the waste of Li batteries is definitely the most important way to reduce the possible effects of Li on environment and consequently its toxicity in human and animals. This might be attributed to the high levels of battery manufacturing and electrochemical systems containing Li. Certainly, recovering the useful metals inside batteries and recycling the plastic constituents are essential to reduce the releasing of Li into the nature and then its accumulation in human body. In fact, the safety of such batteries must enhance alongside the developing reliability and durability. However, much careful shipping is necessary for Li batteries, which contains Li-ion instead of Li-metal. Additionally, companies and manufacturers are able to choose which design for batteries needs fewer regulations in shipping term. Alongside the above comments, protection of the occupational safety can reduce the probable hazards of Li-ion batteries. For instance, workers might be exposed to Li via dust inhalation. Therefore, lowering dust dispersion and improving dust collection are two beneficial ways to decrease the Li exposure at workplace (12). bitter In conclusion, although Li batteries production and application are the great hallmark of progress in advanced and developing countries, careless attention to dispose of such systems may lead to release of this toxic metal into the nature and consequently entrances to edible plants and animals and then accumulation in human body. Regarding the Li potential in causing toxicity in the central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract, reproductive and endocrine systems as well as genotoxicity, mutagenicity and teratogenicity, protection of the occupational safety and minimizing the waste of Li batteries are highly recommended to companies and manufacturers.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,116
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations11
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueIranian Red Crescent Medical JournalMême sujetExtraction and Separation ProcessesTravaux en français237 207