The Hierarchy of Functional Loss Associated With Cognitive Decline in Older Persons
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: We studied a representative cohort of community-dwelling elderly persons to (i) examine the relationship between the loss of specific functional activities and cognitive status at the time of these losses, (ii) compare the cognitive status of participants who have and have not lost independence in these functional activities, and (iii) determine whether a hierarchical scale of functional loss is associated with declining cognitive status. METHODS: A cohort of 5874 community-dwelling persons aged 65 years and older from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging I and II were analyzed. At baseline and 5 years later, cognitive status with the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) and functional status with 14 Older American Resources and Services (OARS) items were measured. For each OARS functional item, the mean 3MS scores for persons who lost independence during the 5-year period versus those who did not were compared. RESULTS: For each functional item, the 5-year decline in 3MS scores of persons who lost independence were significantly greater than those who remained independent (e.g., ability to do finances), with an 18-point decline for those who lost independence and a 2-point decline for those who retained independence. A hierarchy of functional items existed, with instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs) (e.g., shopping, banking, and cooking) being lost at higher cognitive scores than basic ADL items (e.g., eating, dressing, and walking), although there was some overlap. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective study using a large representative cohort of elderly persons to demonstrate that progressive cognitive decline is associated with a specific pattern of loss of functional tasks. Clear cognitive thresholds at which development of dependency in OARS functional items occurred. By providing estimates of the cognitive status of persons at the time at which they developed dependency in specific functional items, a natural hierarchy of functional loss associated with cognitive decline emerged. For caregivers, clinicians, and health policy makers, this information can help anticipate the pattern of functional decline and the subsequent care needs of persons with declining cognition, potentially improving the quality of life of these persons and their caregivers and playing an important part in health care planning.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».