ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN TINGKAT CASH HOLDING SEBELUM DAN SESUDAH KRISIS KEUANGAN GLOBAL 2008 (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Subsektor Properti dan Real Estate yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2002-2014)
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat perbedaan tingkat cash holding Perusahaan properti dan real estate pada periode sebelum dan sesudah krisis keuangan global 2008. Pengujian dilakukan menggunakan metode uji beda (paired sample t test). Kemudian dilakukan uji regresi untuk memahami bagaimana perbedaan cash holding sebelum dan sesudah krisis terjadi dengan menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pembentukan cash holding sebelum dan sesudah krisis. Hasil uji beda menunjukkan bahwa tingkat cash holding Perusahaan berbeda pada periode sebelum dan sesudah krisis. Rata-rata cash holding Perusahaan meningkat sesudah krisis. Berdasarkan hasil uji t, faktor yang secara signifikan mempengaruhi tingkat cash holding pada periode sebelum krisis yaitu ukuran Perusahaan, arus kas, dan dividen. Sedangkan faktor yang secara signifikan mempengaruhi tingkat cash holding pada periode sesudah krisis yaitu ukuran Perusahaan, leverage, arus kas, dan modal kerja bersih. Berdasarkan hasil uji F, faktor pertumbuhan penjualan, ukuran Perusahaan, leverage, arus kas, modal kerja bersih, dividen, dan suku bunga secara simultan mempengaruhi cash holding Perusahaan. Kata kunci: cash holding, properti, real estate, krisis keuanganThis study aims to determine whether there are differences in the level of cash holding real estate and property company in the period before and after the global financial crisis of 2008. The tests were conducted using comparative test methods (paired sample t test). Then, regression test to understand how differences in cash holdings before and after the crisis occurred by analyzing the factors that influence the formation of holding cash before and after the crisis. Different test results showed that the level of cash holding companies differ in the period before and after the crisis. The average cash holding companies increase after crisis. Based on the results of the t test, factors that significantly affect the level of cash holding in the period before the crisis is the size of the company, cash flow, and dividends. While the factors that significantly affect the level of cash holding in the period after the crisis is firm size, leverage, cash flow and net working capital. Based on the results of the F test, sales growth factor, firm size, leverage, cash flow, net working capital, dividends, and interest rates simultaneously affect cash holding company. Keywords: cash holding, property, real estate, global crisis DAFTAR PUSTAKA Abushammala, S. N. M. dan Sulaiman, J. (2014). Impact of Macroeconomic Performance on Corporate Cash Holdings: Some Evidences From Jordan. Asian Economic and Financial Review, Vol. 4, No. 10, 1363-1377. Acharya, V. V., Davydenko, S. A., dan Strebulaev, I.A. (2012). Cash Holdings and Credit Risk. Western Finance Association 2008 Meetings Paper. Alltizer, R. L. dan Swanson, Z. L. (2014). Cash Position Forecasts Pre and Post the 2008 Market Crash. Journal of Business Strategies, Vol. 31, No. 1, 205-220. Almeida, H., Campello, M., Weisbach, M. (2004). The Cash Flow Sensitivity of Cash. Journal of Finance, Vol. 59, No. 4, 1777-1804. Arslan, O., Florackis, C., dan Ozkan, A. (2006). The Role Of Cash Holdings in Reducing Investmentcash Flow Sensitivity: Evidence From a Financial Crisis Period in an Emerging Market. Emerging Markets Review, 7, 320-338. Autukaite, R. dan Molay, E. (2013). Cash Holdings, Working Capital and Firm Value: Evidence From France. Working Paper, SSRN Electronic Library, SSRN-ID: 1836900. Bank Indonesia. (2011). Berita Properti. Jakarta: Tim Statistik Sektor Riil Direktorat Statistik Ekonomi dan Moneter Bank Indonesia. Basheer, Muhammad Farhan. (2014). Impact of Corporate Governance on Corporate Cash Holdings: an Empirical Study of Firms in Manufacturing Industry of Pakistan. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, Vol. 7, No. 4 A, 1371-1383. Bates, T., Kahlle, K., Stulz, R. (2009). Why Do US Firm Hold So Much Cash Than They Used To Be? Journal of Finance 64, 1985-2021. Bitrus, Yamden Padok. (2011). The Determinants of The Demand For Money in Developed and Developing Countries. Journal of Economics and International Finance, Vol. 3, No. 15, 771–779. Brigham, E.F. dan Houston, J.F. (2004). Fudamentals of Financial Management (10nd ed.). USA: Thomson South-Western. Chen, N. dan Chang, M. (2013). Financial Crisis and Corporate Liquidity: Implications for Emerging Markets. Asia-Pacific Finan Markets, 20: 1–30. Chen, N. dan Mahajan, A. (2010). Effects of Macroeconomic Conditions on Corporate Liquidity-International Evidence. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 35, 112-129. Daher, Mai. (2010). The Determinants of Cash Holdings In UK Public and Private Firms. Dissertation, Lancaster University Management School. Dahrouge, F.M., dan Saito, R. (2013). Cash Holdings Policy: A Dynamic Analysis of Brazilian Companies. Rev. Bras. Financas (Online), Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 11, No. 3. Damodaran, Aswath. (2005). Dealing with Cash, Cross Holdings and Other Non-Operating Assets: Approaches and Implications. Working Paper, Stern School of Business. Davis, Henry H. (2007). Interest Rates. Encyclopedia of Business and Finance. Ed. Burton S. Kaliski. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA. Departemen Komunikasi dan Informatika. (2008). Memahami Krisis Keuangan Global Bagaimana Harus Bersikap. Jakarta: Tim Penyusun Buku. Duchin, Ran. (2010). Cash Holdings and Corporate Diversification. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 65, No. 3, 955-922. Eriyanto. (2007). Teknik Sampling Analisis Opini Publik. Yogyakarta: LKiS Yogyakarta. Eiteman, D. K., Stonehill, A.I., dan Moffett, M.H. (2010). Multinational Business Finance (12nd ed.). USA: Pearson Education. Ferreira, M.A. dan Vilela, A.S. (2004). Why Do Firms Hold Cash? Evidence from EMU Countries. European Financial Management, Vol. 10, No. 2, 295–319. Fischer, M., Marsh, T., dan Brown, T. (2014). Cash Holdings of SaP Firms Over the Past Decade. Accounting and Finance Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, 143-150. Gill, A. dan Shah, C. (2012). Determinants of Corporate Cash Holdings: Evidence from Canada. International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 4, No.1. Gregory, A. dan Wang, Yuan-Hsin. (2013). Cash Acquirers: Can Free Cash Flow, Debt and Institutional Ownership Explain Long-Run Performance? Review of Behavioral Finance, Vol. 5, No.1, 35-57. Guney, Y., Ozkan, A., dan Ozkan, N. (2007). Additional International Evidence on Corporate Cash Holding. EFMA Helsinki Meetings. Hermawan, Asep. (2009). Penelitian Bisnis: Paradigma Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Grasindo. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2009). Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan: Laporan Arus Kas. Jakarta: Ikatan Akutansi Indonesia. Irwan, Lella N. Q. (2012). Penetapan dan Proyeksi Tingkat Suku Bunga Bank Indonesia (BI-Rate) Hubungannya dengan Laju Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia. Trikonomika, Vol. 11, No. 2, 148–159 Kim, S., Seo, J., dan Sohn, P. (2011). SMEs' Capital Structure Behavior on Cash Holdings to Korean Financial Crisis: The Evidence From Emerging Market. African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 5, No. 34, 13095-13115. Keown, A.J., Martin, J. D., Petty, J. W., dan Scott, D.F. (2005). Financial Management: Principles and Applications (10th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education. Khadem, R. dan Pettersson, P. (2013). The Optimal Way To Increase Cash Holdings: From A Market Perspective - A Study Of Various Ways To Increase Cash Holdings And Their Implications On Market Value During Economic Boom And Recession. Sweden: Department of Business Administration of Lund University. Kusumaputra, Robert Adhi. (2011). Rahasia Sukses Pengusaha Properti. Jakarta: Bhuana Ilmu Populer. Lee, P. dan Williamson, R. (2002). What is a Dollar Worth? The Market Value of Cash Holdings. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 18120. Lee, P., Stulz, R.M., dan Williamson, R. (2012). Multinationals and the High Cash Holdings Puzzle. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. Lee, Y. dan Song, K.R. (2012). Long Term Effects of a Financial Crisis: Evidance from: Evidence from Cash Holdings of East Asian Firms. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,Vol. 47, No. 3, 617-641. Levine, et al. (2011) Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel (5th ed.). USA: Pearson Education. Lind, D.A., Marchal, W.G., dan Wathen, S.A. (2010). Statistical Techniques in Business a Economics (14th ed.). New York: Mc-Graw Hill. Luo, Fu-Yan. (2014). Monetary Policy Shock, the Strength of Bank Relationship and Corporate Cash Policy. International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 6, No. 7. McGuinness, Bill. (2000). Cash Rules : Learn and Manage The 7 Cash-Flow Drivers For Your Company's Success. Washington: The Kiplinger Washington Editor, Inc. Nisfiannoor, Muhammad. (2009). Pendekatan Statistika Modern untuk Ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Humanika. Ozkan, A., Ozkan, N. (2004). Corporate Cash Holdings: an Empirical Investigation of UK Companies. Journal of Banking a Finance, Vol. 28, 2103–2134. Priyatno, Duwi. (2012). Belajar Cepat Olah Data Statistik dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta : Andi. Raco, J.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle