MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W213952377

Enemies from the East? V. S. Soloviev on Paganism, Asian Civilizations, and Islam

2009· article· en· W213952377 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Randall A. Poole

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPaganismIslamPoliticsMythologyPhilosophyReligious studiesMoralityClassicsHistoryLiteratureTheologyChristianityLawEpistemologyArtPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Vladimir Wozniuk, ed. and trans. Enemies from the East? V. S. Soloviev on Paganism, Asian Civilizations, and Islam. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2007. xx, 227 pp. Index. $74.95, cloth.Vladimir Solov'ev, Russia's greatest religious philosopher, has exercised vast influence on Russian thought and culture, not only in philosophy and theology, but also in the creative arts, social and political thought, and history. The range of topics explored in this new and important collection of his writings - religion, myth, empire, Islam, Asia, and Russian national identity - attests to his dazzling erudition and will attract readers from all areas of Russian studies and beyond.This is the third volume of Solov'ev essays edited and translated by Vladimir Wozniuk. The first two volumes include some of Solov'ev's most important essays on politics, law, and morality (Yale University Press, 2000) and beauty, love, and ethics (University of Notre Dame Press, 2003), and they have been praised in the scholarly reviews. This new volume displays the same qualities as the previous two. The translation is lucid, accurate, and reads smoothly in natural English. There is good, succinct editor's introduction. Wozniuk's (defensible) editorial approach is minimalist, but in places he might have provided more annotations and references. In some cases I think he should have translated Solov'ev's quotations from the original (rather than back-translating from Russian) and checked them more closely in order to correct apparent mistakes in the original typesetting (e.g., placement of quotation marks). Finally I would have used the modern pinyin system of Romanizing Chinese rather than the old and largely discarded Wade-Giles system (e.g., Laozi instead of Lao-tzu, Dao Dejing for Tao-te-ching, Mozi for Mo-tzu, etc.). But these are quibbles about work of high quality.Enemies from the East? brings together six essays that span Solov'ev's entire career, from his first published essay (written when he was just twenty years old) to one of his last (written fours years before his death in 1900). The volume is thus remarkable record of the philosopher's intellectual development and will be of great interest to Solov'ev scholars. Beyond that it pertains to lesser known - but fascinating - dimension of Solov'ev's work, his interest in world religions and civilizations, including India, China, Japan, and Islam. Perhaps the most general way of assessing the volume's value is to say that it presents powerful perspective from one of Russia's most subtle and perceptive thinkers on the country's eastern neighbours. The essays can be read as reflections on Russia's own national identity, straddled between East and West. They explore the meaning of being Eurasian in the broadest sense of the term. They are also intriguing and revealing statements by Christian philosopher writing in multinational empire that included substantial Muslim minority. It is surely significant, as Wozniuk observes, that Solov'ev's essay on Muhammad and early Islam was republished in Russia in 1 994, in the midst of the Chechen war.In comparison with most of Solov'ev's other writings available in English, Enemies from the East? is more historical and cultural than speculatively philosophical. Particularly noteworthy is the essay on the founder of Islam. It is, as Wozniuk characterizes it in his introduction, a remarkably balanced, engaging, and accessible account of Muhammad and the theological foundations of Islamic culture and civilization (p. xvii). Yet Solov'ev was Christian apologist, albeit an ecumenical and tolerant one. The essays in the volume were written from his conviction that Christianity is the highest and truest of the world's religions. He believed that the goal of universal history is the self-realization of humanity 's divine potential in Godmanhood (bogochelovechestvo), which was for him the very essence of Christianity. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,947
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,944

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,203
Écart entre enseignants0,184 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Slavonic PapersMême sujetReligious Studies and Spiritual PracticesTravaux en français237 207