The Immigrant Investor Program: Proposed Solutions to Particular Problems
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I. INTRODUCTION In 1990, the traditional immigration policy aims of uniting families and providing asylum for the tired, poor, and weary masses gave way to the realization of economic goals. The Immigration and Naturalization Act(1) tripled the number of employment-related visas(2) and created the immigrant investor category.(3) The immigrant investor program(4) allows a qualified investor to obtain a visa if he or she commits $1 million, or $500,000 in targeted areas. The money must be committed to a new enterprise in which the investor is actively involved, and the investment must create ten jobs for U.S. workers.(5) The investor first receives conditional permanent resident status for two years, and then the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) reviews the enterprise to confirm that jobs have been created and the statutory requirements satisfied.(6) When passing the Immigrant Investor Program, lawmakers were motivated not only by the realization that foreign investment is necessary to the U.S. economy, but also by competition from other countries in attracting foreign capital.(7) Foreign investment affects the U.S. economy in several ways: it increases production capacity, enhances industry growth and competition, raises tax revenue, creates jobs, assists in the financing of the deficit, and introduces new ideas to U.S. businesses. Foreign investment increases the nation's productive capacity by adding assets to the existing capital stock,(8) which enables businesses to grow and modernize.(9) Foreign investors' contributions of assets have significantly enhanced the United States' ability to compete in worldwide industry.(10) Investment from abroad not only aids in business growth and competitiveness, but also generates large amounts of tax revenue in the form of income, sales, excise, property, and other taxes.(11) The more obvious benefits of foreign investment are the millions of U.S. workers employed and the billions of dollars in goods exported into world markets.(12) Perhaps the least recognized benefits are the introduction of new production techniques and new management strategies.(13) In addition, it is argued that foreign investment has stabilized the U.S. economy and has helped finance the trade deficit, allowing U.S. residents to enjoy a higher standard of living without the expected increase in taxes.(14) As Congress recognized in its formulation of different required investment amounts, immigrant entrepreneurs appear to have a special role in economic recovery.(15) Self-employment among immigrants has grown significantly over the last decade and plays a large role in rejuvenating urban neighborhood economies.(16) These immigrant entrepreneurs and their families maintain ties to their homelands that significantly increase export opportunities.(17) In addition, the social cohesion inherent in immigrant communities transfers to economic relationships as immigrant firms begin to integrate and become interdependent, allowing the firms to compete globally.(18) The second motivation for the passage of the Immigrant Investor Provision was the desire to compete with similar programs offered by Canada and Australia. The concept of economic citizenship--granting citizenship or residency status to foreigners who have capital to invest to create jobs in the host country--became the new strategy to attract foreign investment during the 1990s.(19) Immigrant investor programs are expected to facilitate investment flows into the host country and to maintain the capital in the country by offering citizenship to the investors.(20) Both developing and developed countries have begun to use this strategy to attract foreign investment(21) and have focused their efforts on the millionaires fleeing Hong Kong and other parts of Asia.(22) The passage of the investor category in the United States was heralded with lofty promises of millions of dollars of capital infusion and the creation of tens of thousands of jobs. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,023 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,013 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,022 | 0,010 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,039 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».