MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2139863901 · doi:10.1097/tp.0b013e3182481347

Infections and Organ Transplantation

2012· article· en· W2139863901 sur OpenAlexaff
Paolo Grossi, Alessandro Nanni Costa, Emily A. Blumberg, Matthew J. Kuehnert, Jay A. Fishman, Michael G. Ison, R. Lattes, Camille N. Kotton, Daniele Lilleri, Anna Kabanova, Antonio Lanzavecchia, Giuseppe Gerna, Raymund R. Razonable, Patrizia Comoli, Marco Zecca, Sabrina Basso, Fabrizio Ginevri, Alessandra Agnese Grossi, Francesco Paolo Schena, Antoni Rimola, Patrizia Burra, Elenora De Martin, K. Rodriguez-Castro, S. Fagiuoli, L. Pasulo, Raffaele Bruno, Pietro Andreoné, Elisabetta Loggi, Fabio Arena, Gian María Rossolini, Gabriele Sganga, Valerio Cozza

Notice bibliographique

RevueTransplantation · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Établissements canadiensUniversity Hospital Foundation
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTransplantationOrgan transplantationIntensive care medicineContext (archaeology)Organ donationMedicineEuropean unionDonationEconomic shortageRisk assessmentSurgeryBusinessBiologyLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

SECTION 1: ORGAN, TISSUE, AND CELL VIGILANCE IN ITALY Alessandro Nanni Costa, and Deirdre Fehily As the regulation of organ, tissue, and cell donation and transplantation has developed in the European Union, the Italian Transplant Network, coordinated by National Transplant Centre (CNT), has led the implementation of the legislative requirements in Italy, focusing efforts on ensuring safety from the moment of donor identification to the clinical follow-up of recipients. The European legal framework covers substances of human origin and comprises a series of Directives, the most recent of which defines the requirements for organ donation and transplantation (Figure 1).FIGURE 1: The development of EU Regulation of substances of human origin.Vigilance is a fundamental element identified in all of these Directives, with a requirement for the notification of serious adverse events (SAEs) and reactions (SARs). Safety and Risk in Organ Transplantation All types of transplantation imply inherent risks that must be minimized through the application of stringent safety procedures. In the case of organ transplantation particularly, the associated risks must be weighed against the benefits of receiving a transplant in the context of organ shortage. Italian transplantation guidelines identify five levels of risk: Unacceptable risk An increased but acceptable risk Calculated risk Non-assessable risk or potentially high risk for infectious disease transmission Standard risk An example of risk level 4 would be a case where during 2 weeks before donation, the donor had participated in high-risk behavior for infectious disease transmission (e.g., prostitution or drug injection), the possible positivity for which might not be detected even through the most sensitive techniques of molecular biology are applied. Only those potential recipients who signed a specific consent form when they were entered on the waiting list can receive organs categorized with this risk level. Although the Italian guidelines are now well established, each case is different and individual decisions are frequently required to ensure that valuable organs are not lost and recipients are not exposed to unjustifiable risk. This process is supported by a system of “Second Opinion” for evaluation of risk. A 24 hr a day, 7 days a week support is provided by a team of specialists in infectious disease, pathology, legal medicine, intensive therapy and immunological disease. Two National Coordinators are available for a second opinion on organ suitability and therapeutic suggestions for donors or recipients. In the case of donor malignancies, considerable improvements have been achieved in detection before transplantation (Figure 2). All the centers transplanting organs from infected or neoplastic donors are asked to supply regular follow-up data to the National Centre for Transplantation, so that the implications of transplanting organs with elevated risk are closely monitored.FIGURE 2: Timing of neoplasia identification.Table 1 shows the donations classified as involving “Calculated Risk” and demonstrates the value, in terms of effective transplants, of applying this approach to donor selection.TABLE 1: Transplants with calculated risk 2003–2010Risk reduction and management requires continual reevaluation of changing and emerging risk. In Italy, the arrival of West Nile Virus required additional monitoring and the application of safety measures to reduce any risk of transmission by transplantation (1). Retrospective screening of organ donors in 2009 provided valuable information regarding the spread of West Nile Virus (2). Vigilance However, despite the application of safety guidelines and the establishment of advisory networks, mistakes can happen and unexpected transmissions occur. The most important serious adverse reaction (SAR) in the field of organ transplantation in Italy in recent years was the transmission of HIV to three organ recipients after a transcription error in a testing laboratory (3). The incident resulted in a thorough review of the safety system, the establishment of a National Safety Audit Commission and a survey and audit program of testing laboratories. When tragic incidents of this type occur, it is essential that the outcomes and lessons learned be effectively communicated to all those involved in the network, so that appropriate measures can be taken to prevent recurrence. Since February 2007, CNT has been collecting information regarding all SARs and SAEs occurring nationally within the transplant network, applying the definitions used in the European Directives (“serious adverse event” means any untoward occurrence associated with the procurement, testing, processing, storage, and distribution of tissues and cells that might lead to the transmission of a communicable disease, to death or life-threatening, disabling, or incapacitating conditions for patients or which might result in, or prolong, hospitalization or morbidity. “Serious adverse reaction” means an unintended response, including a communicable disease, in the donor or in the recipient associated with the procurement or human application of tissues and cells that is fatal, life-threatening, disabling, incapacitating or which results in, or prolongs, hospitalization or morbidity). A national reporting form was adopted in May 2010, which is submitted together with a detailed report for each notification. Adverse events, where no patient has been harmed but an incident has occurred which implied or still implies risk, are considered important within the Italian system where they allow the sharing of information for the prevention of harm. Reports indicate that serious adverse reactions or events (SARE) occur at all stages of the process from donation to transplantation (Figure 3).FIGURE 3: Reports of Serious Adverse Events and Reactions in the field of Transplantation in Italy.European Union funded projects, particularly EUSTITE (European Union Standards and for the of and (European for the of Organ have developed important of and evaluation to support have been in the Italian system where they support the process of of and the of any or The of is by the of a for the of adverse events and reactions on a to the Italian Transplant The Italian demonstrates that the and of outcomes in transplantation are essential for ensuring and an level of risk for donors and recipients. Nanni taken to reduce the risk of West Nile transmission by transplantation in on of the Italian Transplant Retrospective screening of organ donors in Italy, of West Nile Nanni organs used for transplant in Italy to human SECTION 2: VIGILANCE AND and malignancies, have been a of in the events has required an involving transplant organ procurement and the Organ and Transplantation from review of potential transmission events has the for of involved in disease The for in the was developed in with the of specific and the National Organ Transplant of which the and Organ system and requires to prevent the procurement and transplant of organs from donors infected with HIV (1). In the of and the the to to prevent the of organs from donors infected with as in (2). to guidelines for testing organ donors and transplant recipients for the specific of infectious and that organs from with HIV not be used (3). In with these the to to identify and disease transmission In the reporting of all potential or transmissions of a including and malignancies, after procurement of a donor organ to the The was to these of potential disease this had the with the risk and of specific of potential disease The is a with that in infectious pathology, transplant and transplantation (e.g., as well as transplant and organ procurement laboratory and The are submitted to the Safety of the system and available to all in an report through a The additional information to and in involved the case a nationally disease (e.g., and or testing is notification of centers that have potentially recipients as and follow-up to patient at the of the case the of the transmission events as and the of the information from the case and and has with the transplant through at and in and 2: of to have increased However, despite not all donor and have been with have not any events during a specific reporting to the patient safety system has a recent of The of are to potential transmission are frequently The most to potential transmissions were and were most associated with and and were to result in and transmissions on a The most to was cell but transmission events were to occur when donors had or of to 3: of of the of in transmission events in the have been by of transmission events to the Safety it is not donors have or to recipients. on 2009 that of donors resulted in a or transmission When donors are an of data from that when and donor are a of donors in the at 1 disease transmission occurred with of all donors of and of all of This was on the report of or transmission events in that that resulted in transmissions to individual recipients. to transmission events have been and it has been to the of death and in patients with transmission on the to the in 2010, the associated with and transmission events was for recipients with a transmission and of for all recipients in where the donor resulted in at or has in transmission events and reporting have events that have been associated with disease transmission and for transmission by the of have been recent are as has been an increased of testing to identify donors with and This the of identification of these in infected of the A review of results to the Safety was at the of This review that results for and for of potential disease transmission to the Safety for to donors had disease transmission and donor had with all three recipients in this was detected by after the transplant as a of of the results for donor which were by a different laboratory that used for organ donor This regarding the of results by for additional donor transmission events have been a In an at the of in 2010, donors to of recipients and 2009 the of were to of donors had potential risk for transmission was organ to Adverse recipient outcomes were with of and recipient was in recipients who were appropriate as by donors with be used organs are not used and are to risk recipients evaluation of potential transmission by with for the of the reporting system and and reporting of potential transmission events to the Safety of of recipient outcomes in donors with system of associated as and as the donor and of transmission events A of to have a on the of disease transmission to organ transplantation in the donor testing for a of including and to be This is important as the donor The of donors on transmissions is at organ donors West Nile from a donor and this to all recipients of this organs with adverse results to of donors the of donor the of on donor results has not been is recipients be to transmission follow-up of transmission events has increased in the reporting each during the years with the requirement for transplant centers and organ procurement to report potential transmission events to the national reporting system by the of these by a team of transplant has of risk associated with transmission this has led to an increased to and donor an process that to result in transplant The and for for transmission of human through transplantation of human tissues and and transmission events in the by the Transplant for the Safety of with HIV and donors in the testing A report from the of from the of of transplantation of organs from Transplantation and transmission to the recipient of a Transplant in organ of clinical risk. of West Nile from an organ donor to transplant recipients. West Nile Virus transmission organ transplantation and SECTION 3: AND This a review of lessons learned from recent transmissions through organ including HIV transmission from and results of a the of testing for organ donor identification of in organ the for data to risk to the of The of and Safety and within for and and with in the and of and transplantation the of a system for organ disease transmission in the for adverse events, including disease on to data to in patient Since HIV was to be through organ transplantation in the a of (e.g., West Nile (e.g., (e.g., and (e.g., have been in the transmission of a was in each from a donor with of disease transmission from donors with in with is that are for HIV and are of for donor In 2007, in an in which HIV and were from a donor to organ transplant recipients This had been before and resulted in the death of with the patients The who was on evaluation to be at elevated risk for HIV was with as is by and for of HIV and but was to be with HIV and as by on at the of organ donor screening with HIV and would have this tragic and be In HIV was to a recipient from a donor the recipient developed an and was to have the donor was with and an was the donor was to be at high risk to behavior who have with and HIV days before organ was was in the donor days before transplant and in the recipient days with donor and recipient As of this now for donor screening no 7 days before organ donor and recipient consent is taken by the transplant must be adopted by the to and can result in a and at the of this is no national for screening of A survey has that recipients who receive organs from high-risk donors are for HIV to of despite to so in the the of and recipient testing, it is that have been HIV transplant transmissions as is on a of a as or to is to from these events, and this is it is to on adverse events and process incidents in organ in the and In the of must be used to the risk of transmission screening and the potential of additional Although is for screening donors for infectious is no for of in donor In a recent the of not for and in donor with of the potential organ donor to the risk of HIV and transmission and the additional reduction of risk by the of The was by in potential organ from donor and to risk. was and for and risk, when was to risk for HIV was from 1 in to 1 in for risk, and from 1 in to 1 in for high risk. was and for and risk, when was to risk was from 1 in to 1 in for risk and from 1 in to 1 in for high risk. these is infected donor that is and to three donors of which are When the risk of HIV and of tissue, and organ it is that high-risk organ donors are to HIV and to In these results that screening screening reduce the of HIV and potential organ donors and patient organ and recipient The transplant on the of in organ donor screening is A report by and of the not to for and as the of for the screening of potential organ donors increased risk the report that be considered to reduce the risk of transmission and potentially organ with the for Although are and not be in this were on of of and of years for all when was used for all However, were a of in this it is that are 1 in on testing laboratory and data be so that it can be was not calculated for of in high-risk even it was so it is the was for of screening was that is to a different of opinion on the of on the of high-risk and that the are HIV risks and not risk for as and have led to efforts to the The on transmission prevention of and and an process to support the The process was developed in five with from the by transplant The is by that developed by the and The was developed from a review of the is no to opinion was or the and was as a The is in and be for after which it be and as In donors at high risk can be identified and the risk to the possible for recipients. This process the of an organ donor and laboratory screening are to the risk of donors through these including However, are including the for to the risks of and to organ on donor for development of the risk and are The organ transplant field is by the of on patient safety and is efforts on the transplant a on safety to the on in risk management in lead to in the suitability of organs and and patient The and the of the and those who on the for transplant A in the evaluation of organ Transplant disease transmission events in the by the Transplant for and through organ for and from the for the in Transplant of by organ Transplantation of human and from an organ donor to transplant recipients. Transplant for and HIV from a organ in for and for transmission of human through transplantation of human and Vigilance in of of a transplantation transmission to safety and of organ and for the Organ risk of human and potential organ donors from organ procurement in the Transplant testing of organ is the the A Transplant SECTION AND in have increased the of clinical of As with human the prevention of associated with is to the and of this regarding the potential of including from tissues in human recipients. in regarding the risk for in the of human The transmission of and through organ is well screening for organ donors are not and with national and with the of screening Organ transplantation is a effective means by which to tissues as for donor which the for a or of of the recipient of to by effective conditions those to in and and and In is regarding the and clinical of that might in The of be in Although screening of for potential be by the of for potential human screening for donor can be to be and those used for human organ used to to reduce the for the of these on infectious risk has not been The regarding in to the risk for transmission of Two of are to be of on the of this in after human and the with the that this of is of human cells in of after human (e.g., and is an important in human in but to be specific and would be to in the tissues from the for each closely have been identified in that infectious Two of A and can human and cells in The cells from to be A and are in all tissues and in all of to is tissues in terms of the and of with in or The risk for to might be with of or in that the and on cell of to has been in human cells in and no disease to this of has been in or to to be to available The identification of and have the development of sensitive for these and for of these from The identification of potential human occur on the at in clinical In the risks of and In to the of the recipients might be at an increased risk for have been to and from and for and for in the of infectious be used as for that are the most approach to in and is the of molecular techniques as and molecular to infectious in the and tissues of recipients. screening of used as donors for a of safety that which is available in the that is available for screening of organs from human can receive at the of clinical waiting and the risks for or the of tissues to be to by of the human including and human the potential benefits of and in the available for in donor clinical to be at this of and be to for screening and to safety to the possible in of of by organ in transplant recipients. of in organ transplant recipients. Transplant An on disease transmission in organ Transplant in The of testing in suitability of donors and and cell An essential risk Transplant of and for clinical of human cells by an of 3: and of three of of of in of in 3: SECTION AND A Organ transplantation is a effective for patients with in and have and and patient after organ transplantation (1). are in of an organ are available organs through procurement As a from organs through that human as of organs to the donor and the The has measures to the and from transplant and the of tissues and including to the of in human tissues and organs the of transplant the Transplantation and the of the on Transplant and Organ in This led to the of the of on Organ and Transplant which provided the for procurement of organs and to organ and transplant are still the is to of as in the of the of the of organ and transplant is A for this is that are no of who have organs have been a of that have the of the in the and the available data from the patients organs from a of including and the of all on have organs from in the and the is were to be and and data from that is patient and of organs through transplant when with organs through This adverse has been to a of and and This report review the available data on and infectious of transplant Transplant In most developed that organ are as to all organ donors are to be this screening the form of a review of the and a detailed and screening for by and testing As a transmission of particularly in the of donation, from donor to recipient is data that disease including transmission of and are recipients of organs through transplant of and of after transplant have been of which a of and transmission as high as and have been and for of all in transplant in the identified and those patients with had or of disease taken with the through the transplant that disease transmission in of patients to have transplant this is at has been in the transplant of Transplant The of infectious after transplant to be that in who organ through appropriate Two types of to be increased in transplant as and as patients had a a or after transplant patients these with that are to In three that of disease transplant and all had of and of the Transplant be with patients from after had an organ an individual is not well The any have to is they for the is that any patient who transplant against so the patient has been against an organ through transplant that can to not the individual as as to for the it is to the patient for and ensure that the patient is receiving the appropriate on it be to review the evaluation and available from the transplant which of of the are including donor screening these data be from the transplant The recipient be for including and in to from the where the transplant not occur it is that screening of recipients and when available a potential to the transplant of national transplant and is and the is a risk of and in recipients of organs through transplant patients against organs through transplant of the risk to the donor and recipient as well as the the risks associated with transplant and the to it an be to and outcomes of these procedures. in transplant recipients. in organ donation and transplantation in the Transplant Organ donation and in the Transplant of the Organ and transplant and the of organ and in the on Transplant and Organ by the Transplantation and of in The of on organ and transplant Transplantation Transplant A Transplantation Transplant of who transplantation Transplantation Transplant from The of transplant in Transplant of transplant in A Transplants in patients from the transplant waiting Transplant associated with transplant outcomes for and patients receiving donor transplantation in Transplant The of transplant Transplant and of Transplant of donor and recipient to organ Transplant disease transmission events in the by the Transplant An on disease transmission in organ Transplant for and HIV from a organ for and transmission of through of as in organ Transplant in the A 3: Transplant Transplant and in transplant of the transplant and transplant Transplant Organ Transplant The and of transplant An for transplant SECTION are in the transplant of human have been in transplant recipients (1). In the the of is to to the of transplant in with high the in and the of infected to the this in it is possible to that infected organ donors and that the at be at the of organ might be to the organ a of organ is to the risk of This the most that have been or are to be from the of this from an infected donor a recipient has been in a as by (2). is the after transplantation and be used transmission is to be be used for monitoring and when therapy be (3). screening be at this might to to and for clinical of disease transmission through has been The of transmission is to the can be in the of infected for of for transmission from and in the All recipients be at a risk of but the risk is for recipients. has a that and as infected can be in for transmission of the from be considered for before be donors receive before donation, and donors be or from the recipient be for of can be a disease in transplant the in and in has been to have been from donors in a of recipients when the was involved have transmission when was not involved for that during a be in donors with and in those who have in In it be to for the by means of and in Risk of transmission is well is in recipients and can be as high as in recipients of a screening for is before recipients who receive a from a donor from with drug have been used and are by organ against to be to prevent transmission from donors was in the have been in transplant recipients with a in recipients In Italy, all organ donors are for at the of organ The of in effective donors has in the are to regular system but not all transplant centers organs have been used and from donors be has been detected by for in of recipients within the after and all were with report a of transmission Two of transmission of by organ transplantation from donors have been in the the of who be for in before organ has been that all donors from to recipients of or and those who have or to a high-risk for of be for A of is with of donors is In where the disease is transplant organs from infected donors provided no donor is available with in a All transplant recipients who receive an organ from an infected donor be and frequently for transmission laboratory for monitoring are those that identify in the and is no to support that would be to the no can be at this in organ Transplant 2: organ transplant recipients. in the after clinical and therapeutic of by Transplant after donor of after by in a transplant Transplant Two in a transplant the a Transplant in transplant recipients after transplantation with

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,070

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0210,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,281
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations32
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTransplantationMême sujetOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesTravaux en français237 207