Estimating and comparing the rates of gene discovery and expressed sequence tag (EST) frequencies in EST surveys
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
MOTIVATION: Expressed sequence tag (EST) surveys are an efficient way to characterize large numbers of genes from an organism. The rate of gene discovery in an EST survey depends on the degree of redundancy of the cDNA libraries from which sequences are obtained. However, few statistical methods have been developed to assess and compare redundancies of various libraries from preliminary EST surveys. RESULTS: We consider statistics for the comparison of EST libraries based upon the frequencies with which genes occur in subsamples of reads. These measures are useful in determining which one of several libraries is more likely to yield new genes in future reads and what proportion of additional reads one might want to take from the libraries in order to be likely to obtain new genes. One approach is to compare single sample measures that have been successfully used in species estimation problems, such as coverage of a library, defined as the proportion of the library that is represented in the given sample of reads. Another single library measure is an estimate of the expected number of additional genes that will be found in a new sample of reads. We also propose statistics that jointly use data from all the libraries. Analogous formulas for coverage and the expected numbers of new genes are presented. These measures consider coverage in a single library based upon reads from all libraries and similarly, the expected numbers of new genes that will be discovered by taking reads from all libraries with fixed proportions. Together, the statistics presented provide useful comparative measures for the libraries that can be used to guide sampling from each of the libraries to maximize the rate of gene discovery. Finally, we present tests for whether genes are equally represented or expressed in a set of libraries. Binomial and chi2 tests are presented for gene-by-gene comparisons of expression. Overall tests of the equality of proportional representation are presented and multiple comparisons issues are addressed. These methods can be used to evaluate changes in gene expression reflected in the composition of EST libraries prepared from different tissue types or cells exposed to different environmental conditions. AVAILABILITY: Software will be made available at http://www.mathstat.dal.ca/~tsusko
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».