Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cleveland, OH, Delos M. "Toby" Cosgrove, MD, has overseen that institution's transformation, in his words, "from a doctor-centric organization to a patient-problem-centric organization." Once following the traditional hospital model in which departments of surgery and medicine were separate and medical specialists in one organ system or disease state might never speak to colleagues specializing in another, Cleveland Clinic recently embarked upon a major eff ort to organize its clinical staff into broad institutes encompassing closely related organ systems and diseases.Th is approach, Dr. Cosgrove explains, can improve medical care for the individual patient and foster a collaborative environment among clinicians that leads to discovery, innovation, and ultimately, enhanced treatments and better outcomes for patient populations.It was a "novel idea" to "think a hospital should be organized around patients instead of around doctors, " observes Dr. Cosgrove.Th at idea developed from a sense that the traditional organizational model did not take full advantage of the resources a hospital has at its disposal.As a cardiac surgeon in a department of surgery, Dr. Cosgrove met formally with other types of surgeonsneurosurgeons or colorectal surgeons, for example-with whom, he says, "I had almost nothing in common except that we used operating rooms and wore gloves." In contrast, he explains, "I had everything in common with the cardiologists: we shared patients, we shared disease problems . . .gradually the lines between surgery and medicine were blurring."Th e unorthodoxy of a hospital in which cardiac surgeons would share departments with cardiologists was not unwelcome to many members of the Cleveland Clinic community who could imagine some of the potential benefi ts such a restructuring would bring.Dr. Cosgrove notes, "Nobody came and said, 'Th is is a crazy idea.Th is will never work.'" He acknowledges, however, that there was signifi cant concern over the logistical details of the plan, with many of the clinical staff left to wonder, "Who am I going to report to?Where's my offi ce going to be?" Certainly these were legitimate questions: dissolving the traditional medical and surgery departments meant rethinking organizational hierarchies and relocating specialists in related treatment areas so that, for example, the neurosurgeons, neurologists, and psychiatrists could be housed together in their own institute.Despite clear challenges that would
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,069 | 0,079 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,014 | 0,051 |
| Communication savante | 0,025 | 0,035 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,039 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,011 | 0,022 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».