Evaluating preferences for long term wheeze following RSV infection using TTO and best-worst scaling
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) infects 70% of infants under one year, and is a leading cause of infant bronchiolitis-related hospitalizations [ 1 , 2 ]. RSV is a relatively benign, temporary condition, and therefore likely to have limited impact on quality adjusted life years, however, it has potential for long-term consequences such as asthma and wheeze [ 3 , 4 ]. Preferences related to the trade-offs between different long and short term aspects of RSV have not been explored previously, however, deriving preferences for infant health states is very challenging as infants require proxy elicitation of preferences [ 5 – 8 ]. The objectives of this study were to explore preferences surrounding attributes of RSV using proxy- and self-perspectives. Time trade-off (TTO) and best-worst scaling were used to derive utilities for health states of RSV and determine relative preferences for different levels of disease attributes. Vignettes were constructed from focus group data and expert opinion. Respondents were randomized to either a child perspective (“imagine that your child has RSV”), or an adult perspective (“imagine that you have RSV”). Experimental design for the BWS was developed using Sawtooth Software. 1000 Canadians were recruited through a market research panel facilitating a societal perspective. Five attributes were used – hospitalization status, oxygen support, presence of tubes (IV/NG), breathing symptom severity, and risk of long term wheeze. Ethics approval was obtained from the UBC BREB. Respondents completed both TTO and BWS tasks. Disutility associated with the short term health state of RSV was significant. Disutility followed an expected gradient, with more time traded for more severe RSV, and less time traded for less severe RSV (mean range: 0.57 – 0.14). Utilities were lower in the child perspective than the adult perspective. 0% risk of long term risk of wheeze was most preferred over all other attributes, and respiratory failure was least preferred (-4.7). Strong negative preferences were similar for IV/NG (-3.3), ICU admission (-3.5), mechanical ventilation (-3.6), and severe breathing problems (-3.6). Utility associated with risk of wheeze became lower as risk increased, with a relative preference for 80% risk of wheeze (-2.8) between moderate (-1.5) and severe (-3.7) breathing problems. Preferences indicate societal willingness to accept immediate, short term, potentially clinically significant consequences to avoid long term risk of wheeze. This study provides utilities that can be utilized for the evaluation of any potential or proposed treatment of RSV in children, and is important to understanding and applying priorities in health care.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».