MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2143455084 · doi:10.1353/mwr.2015.0029

William Henry Harrison and the Conquest of the Ohio Country by David Curtis Skaggs (review)

2015· article· en· W2143455084 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
William Heath

Notice bibliographique

RevueMiddle West review · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueArchaeology and Natural History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCONQUESTFrontierHistoryState (computer science)LawClassicsAncient historyPolitical scienceArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: William Henry Harrison and the Conquest of the Ohio Country by David Curtis Skaggs William Heath David Curtis Skaggs, William Henry Harrison and the Conquest of the Ohio Country. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014. 303 pp. $44.95. A professor emeritus at Bowling Green State University, the author is a distinguished scholar of the Old Northwest. The present book provides a valuable look at the role Harrison played in the War of 1812 on the Ohio River—Great Lakes frontier. Skaggs emphasizes the significance of Harrison’s use of mounted Kentuckians in his invasion of Canada and the crucial role of logistics in the successful conduct of any military campaign. He has an extensive knowledge of the period, and his forty some pages of footnotes cover most of the relevant primary and secondary sources. The opening two chapters are the weakest. Here the author tends to paint with too broad a brush instead of focusing on significant events that are more relevant to his thesis. The central theme of the book is the role of the militia in fighting Indians. The “well-regulated militia” of the Constitution was an exercise in wishful thinking. In reality, the militia were notoriously “ill-equipped, ill-led, and ill-disciplined.” The author’s brief references to Harmar’s Defeat in October of 1790 and St. Clair’s Defeat on November 4, 1791, leave out the behavior of the militia in those battles, which resulted in 180 and 650 deaths respectively. Instead he cites Charles Scott’s “devastating raids on native villages” as Harrison’s model. Scott led a single raid in 1791 against Wea and Kickapoo villages on the Wabash, claiming to have killed thirty-eight warriors; in truth, the dead were old men, women, and children. James Wilkinson attacked the Miami on the Eel River later that summer. These raids did demonstrate how quickly Kentuckians could ride into northern Indiana and destroy villages, but in neither case did they engage a significant number of warriors in a real battle. Harrison also admired Anthony Wayne, who held the militia in low regard and used them as little as possible. Nonetheless, Harrison was indeed convinced that mounted Kentuckians could play a significant role on the frontier. The second chapter focuses on events leading up to the battle of Tippecanoe. Here again more detail would be helpful. The author praises Harrison’s “talent for negotiations” with the Indians, but never looks closely at his suspect tactics, especially in the all-important Fort Wayne Treaty of 1809, where he deliberately kept the Shawnees away and used Potawatomi warriors as leverage. (Robert M. Owens’s Mr. Jefferson’s Hammer takes a more critical look at Harrison’s conduct.) Neither does Skaggs discuss secretary [End Page 95] of war Henry Knox’s faulty Indian policy and the unfair treaties that led up to President Washington’s costly Indian war in the 1790s. The result is that few of the just grievances of the Indians are presented. The author assumes Native Americans were “doomed” by demographics regardless of what the United States did or didn’t do. Harrison’s complex relationship to the Shawnee Prophet and his brother Tecumseh is too sketchy, as is the sequence of events that led up to Tippecanoe. We need a better sense of how Harrison outmaneuvered President Madison in order to provoke a battle. Although the causes of the War of 1812 are underplayed, once hostilities begin the book gains momentum. Harrison’s initial “campaign” to win command of the army from James Winchester is covered in telling detail. The greatest drawback in this part is that the book jumps around in time, thus losing narrative sequence. The siege of Fort Wayne, Hull’s surrender of Detroit, Indian raids on the frontier, and so forth are discussed in several places. There are also factual errors: in the battle of Fort Dearborn some ninety-five citizens and soldiers were involved, not two hundred; most of them, including William Wells, were killed during the fight, not afterwards. On the other hand, the author rightly stresses Robert Dickson’s role in keeping the Lake Indians on the British side as well as the strategic...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,050
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMiddle West reviewMême sujetArchaeology and Natural HistoryTravaux en français237 207