When a physician marries a physician: effect of physician-physician marriages on professional activities.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether more Canadian family physicians are marrying other physicians and to examine the influence of physician-physician marriages on FPs' professional activities. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a population survey (mailed questionnaire) using regression analysis. SETTING: Canadian family medicine. PARTICIPANTS: Family physicians who responded to the 2001 National Family Physician Workforce Survey conducted by the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) (13 088 respondents; 51.3% response rate). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was self-reported hours spent on professional activities during a typical week. Other information used in this analysis included marital status (currently married or not), hours spent providing dependent care each week, age (65 and older or younger than 65), sex, practice location (rural or not), and age of youngest child (younger than 6 or not). These factors were previously reported to affect amount of time spent on professional activities. Decade of graduation was used descriptively; having a physician spouse was considered a variable in the regression. RESULTS: About 86% of FPs were married; 16% of these were married to other physicians. The proportion of physician-physician marriages increased over time, mainly because male physicians increasingly married female physicians. The youngest cohort had the highest proportion of physician-physician marriages (20%). Having a physician spouse significantly reduced the hours devoted to professional practice. After taking into account the effects of other factors known to influence extent of professional activities, on average, female FPs in physician-physician marriages worked about 5 hours less weekly than other female physicians, and male FPs worked about 3 hours less weekly than other male physicians. The effect of other factors was consistent with previous reports of their influence on professional activities. CONCLUSION: These findings have implications for medical human resource planning. The cumulative effect on physicians' work time that physician-physician marriages have must be considered. Two physicians married to each other might be a marker for a couple with high discretionary income that allows them to make a lifestyle choice of reducing work time. If this is the case, reduction in professional activities is more likely to be found among FPs whose spouses can command a high salary.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,016 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».